Arab Spring new leader Mohammed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood. Also says that Jerusalem will be the new Arab capital of the Middle East. http://english.ruvr.ru/2012_05_13/74584752/ Maybe he's like Obama, though, and was just joshing in what he told audiences on the campaign trail.
Interesting little site. Looking around, you learn things you won't find in Google News. http://english.ruvr.ru/2012_06_24/79162102/
That story has been reported on Google News. https://news.google.com/news/story?...a=X&ei=eNfnT_qDK8Tq2AW4893ZCQ&ved=0CDYQqgIwAQ
I was talking about the 30-40 articles on the front page of Google News, not the thousands of articles accessible in a search. In your search results of 30 articles, every headline says the plane went down in international waters. So to repeat, the Russian site gives information not obviously displayed in standard American news (and in this case, not even after a search of every single article online).
It's the 2nd story of the news section of Google News. I just gave you expanded results from the articles listed on the main page of Google News. 2nd link from the main page of Google News about this story is Turkey account of jet downing contradicts Syria's http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...-fg-turkey-syria-jet-20120625,0,4893302.story And as far as I know LA is still part of the USA. Also you do realize that the Russians have a big weapons selling dog in this fight don't you?
Like every reader, I saw mainly the headline. The headline says that Turkey disagrees with Syria, the same message as all the anti-Syria articles. The headline should have given the most important information which the Russian one did--Turkey agrees with Syria that the Turkish plane entered Syrian waters. After clicking on the headline in your Google search link, a sub-headline saying what the article was hiding in the main headline appeared. And this was the best of the 30 articles. Did any others even report it, in hidden fashion, or did they all just completely leave it out, as most if not all did?
Back in February 2011, James Clapper, O'bama's Director of National Intelligence, was telling the country that the Muslim Brotherhood was a secular, non-violent organization. That seems like a far cry from secular and non-violent to me. Also in Feb of 2011, the Muslim Brotherhood said that their party would not run for the presidency in Egypt. Go Blazers
Besides contentious issues with fuzzy cultural translations, I wouldn't worry about what Morsi said. He is strictly a politician in a pre-Arab spring old school political party. The majority of Egypt's population is very poor and very conservative. This is exactly the kind of rhetoric that stirs them up and gets them to vote (cf. "They hate us cos of our freedoms" or "Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran.") What's Egypt going to do, enact strict Sharia law and sacrifice over 10 billion a year when the tourist trade dries up? I don't think anything like that will happen, and if it does, the youth seem to have no trouble in dropping what they're doing, occupying the city, and ultimately dying for the change they want. Egypt will survive the Brotherhood.
No bigger than the US's dog. Washington’s Hypocrisy over Russian Arms in Syria http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=31582