blowhard - an opinionated person who talks loud and way too long on the same subject, often sensationalizing the subject matter so I watched that play again, and surprise surprise, you don't know what you're talking about. Yes AA hit the QB who limped off the field, but not before he got a pass off for a completion. That anyone would think a completed pass was a sack oh and the Spring game that Arik played in was on May 1st or 5 months ago... the Spring practices he participated in started over a month before that. Math isn't your friend, but we already knew that Since he Redshirted his first year, this is actually Hart's 4th year under Aliotti (Chip often has been quoted that he only coaches the Offense). Along with smarts and experience, he's got great size, athleticism, & a motor that won't stop. My guess is he'll play on Sundays. Still willing to take you up on your sure bet be it sig bet or whatever... but you seem to be backing down while throwing the kitchen sink no doubt. I'm stoked about all of them... both the present and the future That said, I prefer facts over BS for our discussions. Hope it's okay with you, but I'm going to continue to separate the two. STOMP
read the sentence following what you quoted me on for your answer. This is a message board where silly contentions will be debated. If that rubs you the wrong way Mr. Commish, I don't know what to tell you. STOMP
I guess I just don't understand how a thread commending our defense for a job-well-done turned into a slap fight.
I don't understand how every blowout win game thread is one long whine-arama where you'd swear Oregon was down 4 TDs... Funny that the two whiners are now tag teaming duo STOMP
you bitch all game long be it Blazers or Ducks... not my thing Mr Cheerful as I'd rather have good times with friends. When I've commented on some of the silly stuff you've stated in those you've shown yourself to have really thin skin so I've left you alone. Now you show up in this thread to bitch about me pointing out that our starters are killing it and don't need to be replaced by true freshman and righting various nonsense that GP is dumping in the forum. I've not spoken badly about any of the players at all. You don't accept my first polite response to your complaint and so go for the digs in your 2nd and 3rd complaints before I jab back. Now I'm a grumpy individual... whatever dude. STOMP
lol whatever dude. You're the one who has been bitchy. I was merely pointing out that we should be happy that we have an embarrassment of riches when it comes to the D Line and you couldn't just agree. You had to have a douchey tone to your response. That's fine. This thread has nothing to do with the game threads, but since we are going to bring up an overall analysis of posts, I think you are arrogant. You think you know more than everyone else, and you talk down to others. I don't pretend to be an expert on football. So what if BP and I point out negative things in the game thread? It's not just negativity. We post during the ups and the downs, but since you don't participate in the game threads, you only like to come in after the fact and snipe the negative posts. Good for you. I'm sure it makes you feel so big that you are a steadfast supporter of the Ducks with zero negative comments about the team. Bravo. Gold star for you.
Bullshit, and you know it. I absolutely 100% agreed about being happy about Oregon's embarrassment of D-Line riches in my first response but you continued needling like a petty bitch in multiple responses including this disingenuous latest again my first response... "no doubt. I'm stoked about all of them... both the present and the future That said, I prefer facts over BS for our discussions. Hope it's okay with you, but I'm going to continue to separate the two." That should have put the matter to rest, but no. Clearly you've personal issues that have little to do with my participation in this thread. As I responded to your bitchy PM... obviously you're looking for a fight, so just fuck off STOMP
It's a snotty thing to say to someone. There was no need for it. That's why I pointed out, in my next post, that you could have just left it at your first line. Instead you had to take a little jab, telling me that you were gonna continue to argue with so-and-so over petty shit, as long as it's okay with me.... And then you go on to say "If that rubs you the wrong way Mr. Commish, I don't know what to tell you". Sure, you had all the best intentions with either of those lines. You have no intention whatsoever of trying to get under my skin. It's the kind of snarky, angsty post that other people around here like to lob at the mods and it's fairly petty. But I think you just want to argue with people because we tend to point out negative things that bother us. So sorry if I offended your delicate sensibility. Don't try to play the victim though. The bigger man wouldn't have been arguing in this thread in the first place.
really Mom? Is it not snotty to confront someone about their participation in the first place the way you did? Trying to get rid of arguments on a message board... really? Was there a need for that? How about continuing to pick pick pick pick pick pick? How about sending a whiny PM? you're guilty of exactly what you accuse me of you Slypokerdog STOMP
Children, children! Let's all play better together. Now, I want both you STOPMIE and you Natie to stand in a corner for 3 minutes (although it'll probably take less time, IF you get my drift) and then shake hands.
Confronted? Really? Are you sure about that? Yeah, that sure sounds like I confronted YOU. You accuse me of being overly sensitive, but it sure takes thin skin to get butthurt about that post.
