yes, really. And I hate to break it to you, there's a reason those bums lost against him. It's because Newt, Michelle, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, Hunstman and Herman Cain aren't even close to being the political opponent that Obama is.
I did? The more republicans attacked Clinton (like during impeachment), the more popular he became. The more Clinton simply went on TV, the less popular he became. Go figure. Democrats made personal attacks on Ike, Reagan, and W, and all three ended up serving two terms. A little ham handed, but makes the point. http://www.examiner.com/article/are-republicans-stupid
And? The republicans we both refer to (like those in the video) may rally around the party's nominee, but their choice for nominee LOST. That's where those republicans are now - supporting NOT their choice.
Hillary was the front-runner in 2008. She blasted Obama in the primaries. Now, she works for him. What a stupid thread.
for someone who claims to not be a republican, or support a republican in this race, you sure take pleasure in defending said republican.
It's the same-old, same-old. Each party appeals to its base during the primaries and then tack to the center for the general. As for flip-flopping, I don't think Romney is a very ideological guy. On social issues, I think he has strong personal convictions, but not strong political ones. On economic issues, I think he really does think this is a government in need of a turnaround, and he's arguably the most capable of doing it. Anything else is just noise.
Struck a nerve? ....and you're batting .100 in the way your autobiography matches my real biography. Keep taking notes.
Papa G, please stop with the personal insults. You can insult his post, his opinion or me but you have to stop the personal insults.
It's like its a nervous twitch of his. Same with Blazerboy. Just because you're a Republican doesn't mean you need to be angry all the time. I'm just trying to keep the lunacy fair and balanced. If they can't handle it, they need to sit in the corner in timeout.
