Pet Carroll, the defense, and that rook, Wilson, appear to be doing a pretty good job up there. The fact that they beat the Bears in Chicago today says a lot, IMO. That said, I wonder of they'll make the playoffs?
7-5 right now, with ARZ, BUF, SF and STL coming up (all at home, except BUF in Toronto)--I really like the chances of going 10-6, which gets in, imo. If they beat SF too to run the table, and SF loses again somewhere (@NE, as Simmons guesses?) they win the division. 11-5 and winning the division actually might get a bye, as GB and CHI both have 4 losses, and each have lost to the Seahawks already. And of all the playoff teams likely in the NFC: CHI, GB, NYG, SF and ATL--who scares SEA at all? They've already beaten GB and CHI, they played SF tough in SF, and NYG and ATL aren't exactly the 85 Bears. Keep the defense rolling, Wilson getting better....? If SEA gets a home playoff game (or two), they'll be tough
OT: I'm becoming rather impressed with that Foles kid who plays for Philly. Yet another good rookie QB this season. He may very well be their QBOF.
If you're going to take away the GB game, then you have to give up the MIA game. That was bullshit. 7-5 either way.
Ehh iv watched that replay a billion times. It is whatever was called on the field. The whole game was about as poorly officiated as you can get. Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
Im not a seahawk fan but the double catch call didnt have enough evidance to overturn it once it was called. Mainly due to the fact the NFL catch rules are about as stupid as can be and a ball isnt consider caught until the player is down. Im not saying its the correct call just saying after the ruling the play was to muddeled to overturn. Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
