Hickson's mpg didn't figure at all into my "list". I've posted 35+ minutes long before Hickson became a Blazer. Seems as if you're a bit confused.
No, I realized the answer to my own question and gave it. But then PapaG said that it is a coincidence, i.e. the 35 mpg choice appearing to be for no reason other than to exclude Hickson. So I guess that his coincidence answer satisfactorally settles this controversy once and for all.
well "Mr ex kardashian" (Humphries) got a 2 yr 24 mil deal from the Nets after posting similat numbers as JJ. And next summer there are a lot of teams with a lot of capspace and overall it is a weak FA crop, so whattya think BG? He may not get 12 mil per but someone is likely going to overpay
Someone will definitely give him a tidy sum. Here's a link to current stats this season in comparison to LA: http://www.basketball-reference.com...m=0&p1=aldrila01&y1=2013&p2=hicksjj01&y2=2013
if he was on some other team, putting up the numbers he is, and being a free agent, we would all be in agreement on wanting him here..
I never said I didn't want Hickson back I just don't think he's going to come as cheap as some of you are talking about.
If he keeps up this level of production, its gonna take at least 10 mil/yr to keep him..And I still say it's well worth it.
