Spears' Power Rankings - Blazers 14th

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by ABM, Jan 8, 2013.

  1. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    The cool thing about statistics is they can change. Not saying they will but just because you lost 9 times out of 10 doesn't mean you will lose that amount the next 10. Remember that statistic has a couple buffers that don't apply now. We don't have Roy or Nate coaching the team.
     
  2. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,324
    Likes Received:
    43,686
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's correct--historical statistics can be predictive, but are by no means definitive or even normative. I'm certainly not saying that the Blazers can't win, or that there's a 90% chance of losing; my main point was that the post expressing an expectation of victory in both road games was basically asking for a letdown.
     
  3. PHXBlazer1

    PHXBlazer1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    7,093
    Likes Received:
    4,575
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Eugene
    Haha that's why I love this forum. If I want a semantics argument, I'll get one. You already looked up the "meaningless" statistics, so that time is already wasted if we're going there. And, yes, telling you not to tell me what to do, is telling you what to do, bravo! Round 1 to the guy who calls himself Platypus!:ghoti:
     

Share This Page