I did at half time. He showed more in the Butler game. I agree with.the.report.from Draft Express on him.
lol, you've seen 7 minutes of this game and your telling me that he showed more in the Butler game. Look up his stats for tonight. Efficient.
Meant he showed more in the Butler game compared to the last time I commented, which was against U of P.
Efficiency also means less when he is playing against shorter, inferior talent. I look for skills that will transfer to the pro game. Turned the Clipper/Sun game back on since the Zags game is a blowout.
So you think he will be as dominate against stronger and quicker players? His turnover rate is already high.
Now you're just being nauseating. His TO rate is high? lol. I do think he'll be as dominant. His game translates well. He'll be a lotto pick by the time its all said and done.
K, final stat line for Olynyk's perfect night: 26pts, 10rebs, 5asts, and 0 TO's (just for you Charcoal 9-9 from the field, 8-8 from the line. Perfect game. 26pts on 9 shots? Things of legend. Brandon Davies is no chopped liver either.
He needs to stay his final year at Gonzaga. Otherwise his credibility in the draft will put him in the second round. He needs to gain some muscle, gain mass, and generally improve his low post game. At least he doesn't shoot like the Stache from a distance. The Stache was a bust and he failed again on his second attempt in the NBA.
I see more, but I see weaknesses in guys slotted above him. Draftexpress now has him at 20, but McAdoo at 17. With Kelly I see some.things I like but am still waiting to see what the fuss was about with McAdoo. Nate Dogg, staying another year would not be a good idea.
What are the more? With McAdoo its the potential. The guys got good size and plays like a hybrid 4. I like his potential too. Olynyk's stock will continue to rise. He'll be a top 10 pick.
, I do not see.him being a good rebounder at the next level and defense will take some time. He does not show alot of moves scoring down low yet either.
