Official 2013 Draft thread

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Fez Hammersticks, Oct 15, 2012.

  1. BLAZINGGIANTS

    BLAZINGGIANTS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Messages:
    22,015
    Likes Received:
    14,574
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I wasn't putting out "logic" that it's better to draft at #12 than #18. Don't twist my words. I was simply showing that the draft if a crap shoot, and there's talent to be had throughout. You just have to have faith in the management. But since we do have to pay up, I would much rather pay up with the #12 pick in a weak draft than #18 in a strong draft.
     
  2. BLAZINGGIANTS

    BLAZINGGIANTS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Messages:
    22,015
    Likes Received:
    14,574
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not denying that. But if you have to pay the Bobcats with a draft pick..... You give up a weak lotto in a weak draft.

    I'd hedge on this draft. That's my opinion. I'd rather get into the playoffs, create a winning atmosphere, and have more cap space than keep this weak pick. Losing and the lotto is for losers.
     
  3. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,275
    Likes Received:
    26,816
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is not what you mean, I don't think anyway? I believe you mean the opposite. I would still rather have every opportunity to draft the better player in a weak draft than hope a player is there in a stronger one. Even strong drafts have busts, as we know all too well. I misread this. sorry. It's exactly what you mean
     
  4. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,275
    Likes Received:
    26,816
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Like OKC and Miami were losers in the lotto
     
  5. BLAZINGGIANTS

    BLAZINGGIANTS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Messages:
    22,015
    Likes Received:
    14,574
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, but you're beating on something that wasn't even the initial point. My point was since we absolutely have to give the Bobcats a pick (READ: we OWE them, it's not a "FREE" asset as you declared it), I'd rather give them a weak lotto pick in a weak draft.
     
  6. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    For every OKC and Miami; I raise old Clippers, Bucks, Detroit, Bobcats, Sacramento and Minny.
     
  7. BLAZINGGIANTS

    BLAZINGGIANTS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Messages:
    22,015
    Likes Received:
    14,574
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, busts throughout. Successes throughout. With no true stars in this draft, no real difference-makers in this draft, I gladly give up this pick in a weak draft. The odds are against Portland finding a difference-maker in this draft if they are sitting at #12 or #18. If we're going to have cap space to make some acquisitions through free agency, I figured people would want to maximize that and improve more quickly, rather than tie up funds in what is likely going to be a scrub tying up dollars. Seems like common sense to me?
     
  8. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,275
    Likes Received:
    26,816
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Clippers one of the best teams in the league, Detroit has been in the lottery exactly 3 years now, Minny made it to the conference finals with their lottery gem, and if Olshey is as bad as Kahn or McHale at GM, then my argument is over LOL
     
  9. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,275
    Likes Received:
    26,816
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I will never understand this thinking, so let's agree to disagree.
     
  10. BLAZINGGIANTS

    BLAZINGGIANTS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Messages:
    22,015
    Likes Received:
    14,574
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, and those teams hit rock bottom to re-build. We tried that and failed (albeit due to injuries). I think if we want to take that approach, then we need to completely take that type of approach, completely blow it up, and re-build (and hope you get lucky in some form or another, i.e. Durant, plus your GM has to make shrewd moves). But it's obvious management isn't going to take that approach.
     
  11. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Yeah that would suck! HAHAHa

    Wait you said barely making the playoffs is purgatory? The Pistons had one year where they made the playoffs with a losing record and that counts? i would actually call their rebuild starting 2007. That's over 5 years.
     
  12. BLAZINGGIANTS

    BLAZINGGIANTS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Messages:
    22,015
    Likes Received:
    14,574
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Totally agreed. Because I can't agree to think of this year only. I can't just simply look at this year's draft. I have to look at the whole picture: future drafts, free agency, etc. Looking at this year's draft only gets us nowhere. I was under the impression we wanted to maximize our strategies and resources to improving the team, not just considering our potentially weak lotto spot in a weak draft.
     
  13. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,276
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Enjoying watching Erick Green demonstrate how much better he is than every member of the Blue Devils. I would not be upset if we picked him up in the second round this year.
     
  14. NOVoodoo

    NOVoodoo Kickin it in 2525

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2012
    Messages:
    2,057
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Tennessee
    I really like his ability to stop and shoot on a dime. There are a lot of guys who can get to the rim, but you don't see too many guys out there that can stop their drive and knock down a jumper that smoothly.

    I wonder what Ryan Kelly's recent play is doing for his stock. He's having another great all-around performance tonight.
     
  15. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,276
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He can shoot, make good decisions, and play solid team defense, so you have to think there's a place for him in the league--but no matter how well he plays down the stretch and in the postseason, nothing's going to change the fact that he's below-average athletically. He's not quick enough to play on the perimeter, and not stong/explosive enough to really play down low. I almost wonder if he'd be best served to try to add another 20 pounds and try to find a niche as a Mehmet-Okur style perimeter center.

    If he continues to tear it up, someone might take a shot on him in the late 2nd round, but I think he's more than likely going undrafted.
     
  16. NOVoodoo

    NOVoodoo Kickin it in 2525

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2012
    Messages:
    2,057
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Tennessee
    I'd have to agree. I think he's been given more credit on the defensive end than he deserves, as well. He's capable of being a stopper, like when he had that monster block in the first half, but with all the Duke games I've seen, I haven't seem him give consistent effort on the defensive end. Like in the Kentucky game, for example, there were several plays where he was just drifting defensively and completely lost sight of Poythress.

    If I'm taking anyone from this Duke team in the 2nd round, I think I'd gamble on Seth Curry.
     
  17. VanillaGorilla

    VanillaGorilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    12,073
    Likes Received:
    4,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    - Damian Lillard on his facebook 15 minutes ago
     
  18. THE HCP

    THE HCP NorthEastPortland'sFinest

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    70,011
    Likes Received:
    57,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    N.E.P.
    I'll take Zags' opinion on college hoop players over Dame's thank you.
     
  19. MickZagger

    MickZagger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    37,113
    Likes Received:
    15,968
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    V-Town Baby
    I agree with Lillard. Oladipo's a baller.
     
  20. VanillaGorilla

    VanillaGorilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    12,073
    Likes Received:
    4,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I've only seen him play twice and after looking at his game logs, they were two of his worst games. As a hypothetical, how well would he fit in our starting lineup?
     

Share This Page