Science and Religion questions

I'll take my chances, thanks.

 

Wow -- that page is even better than it seemed at first glance. I encourage you to read through all of the proofs. Here's a nice sample:

ARGUMENT FROM FEAR
(1) If there is no God then we're all going to not exist after we die.
(2) I'm afraid of that.
(3) Therefore, God exists.

ARGUMENT FROM THE BIBLE
(1) [arbitrary passage from OT]
(2) [arbitrary passage from NT]
(3) Therefore, God exists.

ARGUMENT FROM INTELLIGENCE
(1) Look, there's really no point in me trying to explain the whole thing to you stupid atheists; it's too complicated for you to understand. God exists whether you like it or not.
(2) Therefore, God exists.

ARGUMENT FROM UNINTELLIGENCE
(1) Okay, I don't pretend to be as intelligent as you guys — you're obviously very well read. But I read the Bible, and nothing you say can convince me that God does not exist. I feel him in my heart, and you can feel him too, if you'll just ask him into your life. "For God so loved the world that he sent his only begotten son into the world, that whosoever believes in him shall not perish from the earth." John 3:16.
(2) Therefore, God exists.

 

Ya THINK?!

 

ARGUMENT FROM INTERNET AUTHORITY
(1) There is a website that successfully argues for the existence of God.
(2) Here is the URL.
(3) Therefore, God exists.

ARGUMENT FROM INCOMPREHENSIBILITY
(1) Flabble glurk zoom boink blubba snurgleschnortz ping!
(2) No one has ever refuted (1).
(3) Therefore, God exists.

FROM SMUGNESS
(1) God exists.
(2) I don't give a crap whether you believe it or not; I have better things to do than to try to convince you morons.
(3) Therefore, God exists.

ARGUMENT FROM META-SMUGNESS
(1) Fuck you.
(2) Therefore, God exists.

 

1)Lampooning is fun
2) Therefore, God exists

 

And, of course, I jest....I jest.

 

Dude trip; he was posting a joke. You should have known when you read the actual link. They don't support theism! Lol

 

I think that page literally has every "proof" ever attempted on S2. Incredible. Waitaminit -- mags, is this your true source of rhetorical fuel?

 

Lol! I've never seen that site before!

 

Hey, the first handful were legit! I wasn't initially inclined to plow through hundreds more...

 

The first 4 are William lane Craig's debate outline.

 

They predate Craig by centuries.

 

I'm just explaining what it is.

 

Me too.

 

As Freud might argue, id is what id is.

 

You've used that already, ABM -- we demand fresh material!

 

Glad you were paying attention.

 

I study your posts like they were gospel, ABM.

 

It only counts, though, if you take them to heart. Now, bend on one knee and repeat after me....