CNN Sources: 3 al Qaeda operatives took part in Benghazi attack

I guess that makes sense, if "tea party and the like" are 25% of all non-profits. I have no idea if they are 25% of all non-profits, but it doesn't seem likely.

If they picked in inordinate number of 'tea party and the like' (tpatl) non-profits, it is harassment, imo. Do you know what they asked the non-profits? Did they ask the tpatl non-profits the same questions they asked the other 75%? Did they treat the tpatl non-profits with the same respect they showed the other 75%?

How would I know why they chose the agency? Maybe Nixon had someone in the FBI that would do his bidding. Maybe President Obama has someone in the IRS that will do his bidding.

I have no problem with the IRS doing their job, which includes scrutinizing non-profits. I do have a problem with it if they do it to intimidate those that disagree with the administration, or if they single groups out for special attention.

Go Blazers

 

This stupid thread is a good way to tell who watches Fox. Because if you don't, you sure don't give a shit about whether a President doesn't tell the media all he knows after a CIA outpost in Benghazi has been attacked.

Standard operating procedure is to have a cover story while the proper response is determined. Only children would complain that a President's surrogate stuck to a cover story for a couple of weeks.

 

Interesting, given the recent news of 3-time Emmy winner Sheryl Attkisson being forced out at CBS for reporting on Benghazi and using "advocacy" in her reporting. Which is laughable on its own. Trying to report the truth is now political advocacy according to CBS News. Dan Rather, anyone??

 

I don't watch Fox. Obama and his administration are clearly lying, though. Even NBC and ABC are now onto it. I'm sorry your feelers got hurt, though, so keep up with the "Fox" nonsense.

 

I don't watch FOX.

The ignorance and smug crap in this post overflows.

 

I don't watch Fox. In fact, I don't have cable/satellite television.

 

He definitely has good writers.

 

Shoot, let me add to the fray.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/mccain-benghazi-cover-investigation-143339866.html

 

Yeah, Stewart looks like a fool after Friday's bombshells.

 

Uh oh...

Republicans want answers!!!

 

Uh oh, leftists who care want answers and accountability.

 

the shame her is that everyone should want the truth

 

U.S. Embassy attacks by president:

3 Carter
3 Reagan
2 Obama
1 GHWBush
1 Clinton
14 George W. Bush

60-70 Deaths in consulate attacks during Dubya's presidency
ZERO Republican outrage during Dubya's presidency

 

Dubya didn't deliberately lie about them and blame deaths on a video when no intel said as much, you balloon. Your posts are getting dumber by the day, as are your deflections. Isn't the poor sap who made the video still in jail? For what? Making a fucking lame ass video that the President of the United States decided to use as a bullshit excuse?

When was a US ambassador killed under Dubya, by the way?

 

He didn't have to lie to protect the CIA, because Democrats don't politicize CIA events, as you and Republicans are doing with Benghazi.

 

Valerie Plame, where the only 'conviction' was a perjury charge, and not the leaking of classified info. Because it was Richard Armitage and Colin Powell who leaked it to Bob Novak, and not anyone in the White House.

You're losing it. Your posts are pathetic at this point.

 

W launched the War on Terror. Al Queda was a force early on.

But you knew that.

How many American deaths under Republican Presidents during WWII?

Also, the crime for Bengazi is in the coverup.

 

Obama has prosecuted the same war fo 5 years. You got me on WW2. But there were more Civil War deaths were under Republican presidents than WW2 American deaths under Democrats.

A couple of days ago with Denny, I had to go back to the Peloponnesian War. I can dig up Neanderthal battles if necessary.

 

Quite.