I am all for trading out of this draft...First off: It's a weak ass draft...

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by BigGameDamian, May 16, 2013.

  1. BigGameDamian

    BigGameDamian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Messages:
    33,143
    Likes Received:
    13,312
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, I disagree. The only players I would be interested in out of this draft is Ben Mclemore, Nerlens Noel, maybe Cody Zeller an if Shabazz is all that he will go top or 5. I don't see anyone outside of those players pushing the Blazers to the next level but go do your homework.
     
  2. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If by "pushing the Blazers to the next level" you mean a guy who is going to be a franchise player then no, there's nobody like that in this draft (at any spot) but to say that there's nobody who could help boost this team's overall talent level and depth (cheaply!) -- particularly at the guard spots -- then you're likely wrong. The Brandon Roy-LMA draft class was seen as being particularly weak and plenty of contributors came out of that one.
     
  3. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, I'm gonna disagree with the thread premise. It may be a "weak draft" (TM) but there are literally a couple of dozen players that I think would've made our team last year (and would next year).

    Who would you rather have, Freeland or Zeller/Olynyk? Pavlovic or Shabazz? Ronnie Price or Caldwell-Pope? Nolan Smith or Nate Wolters? Jared Jeffries or Gobert/Withey/etc.?

    The "youth" thing doesn't make your point well, either. GSW just went to the 2nd round playing a lot of Curry (2009), Thompson (2011), Barnes (2012), Ezeli (2012), Green (2012), etc. It's talent that wins, whether you're as old as Tim Duncan or young as Steph Curry.

    I had been leaning this way, but it's getting stronger each day/combine/drill/measurement, to not only keep our pick but to embrace this draft. Trade LMA for Thompson/3/19 and see what you can get for Wes. Use 3/10/19/39/40/45 to get a mixture of young difference-makers and role players to start building this team back up.

    Just spit-balling to say you keep Dame/X/Batum/Thompson/X with Leonard, Claver, Barton, Freeland, Papanikolou (maybe Wes?) on the bench. If you can add:

    3: McLemore or Oladipo or Porter (assuming Noel's gone)
    10: Zeller/Olynyk/Gobert/(Shabazz if you picked Porter and Wes isn't going to be here)
    19: Adetokuombo or Saric
    39: Wolters
    40: Jamaal Franklin
    45: Muscala

    You end up with the following:

    Dame/Wolters/x
    (McLemore or Oladipo or Shabazz)/Barton/Franklin
    Batum/(maybe Porter?)/Claver
    Thompson/(Olynyk or Zeller)/Papanikolou/Muscala
    X/Leonard (or Gobert)

    And you'd have roughly 20M in cash for free agents and the rights to Saric/Adetokuonbo. If you can't get who you want in FA, play the younguns. If they have growing pains, next year's draft is supposed to be loaded. But I think they have talent, they can be put into roles where they can flourish, and you have team control for a long, long time.
     
  4. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Lmao you talk about keeping talent; then make a "trade lma for Thompson". Lol!!!

    Everything else makes a ton of sense though.
     
  5. oldmangrouch

    oldmangrouch persona non grata

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    12,403
    Likes Received:
    6,325
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I agree. Everyone is getting too focused on the lack of quality big men.
     
  6. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you think somehow that we're "keeping (LMA's) talent" for more than 23 more months, i don't know what to tell you. And I don't think that GIVING UP (?!?!) assets like a lotto pick in a poor and unsustainable attempt to try to get him to stay (with no guarantees) is a worthwhile endeavor. Put another way....the #3 picks from the last decade are:

    Bradley Beal (who would start for us)
    Enes Kanter (who would start for us)
    Derrick Favors (probably wouldn't start, but decent young player)
    James Harden (duh)
    OJ Mayo
    Al Horford
    A_am Morrison (ok, so don't pick Morrison)
    Deron
    Ben Gordon
    Melo
    Pau Gasol

    Would you rather have one of those guys for the next 8-9 years (AND the #19 pick), or 23 more months of the difference between LMA and Thompson on a team that's only making a difference if you cash in on your hope can bring in someone with the #10 pick and cap space?
     
  7. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I have no doubt that Aldridge will stay a Blazer until he retires. So you can spin it anyway you want. There hasn't been the slightest hint that Aldridge is unhappy or even thinking about another team. Nice try.
     
  8. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's foolish.
     
  9. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Foolish is trading Aldridge for Thompson
     
  10. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because they don't have control over it. LMA does.

    Look, here's the situational difference b/w LMA and, say, Lillard. LMA has 23 months before he's an unrestricted free agent. Think LeBron/Bosh in 2010, Melo/Deron in 2011, Dwight last year (before he signed his extension), and now this year. Everyone except Melo said the right things as well, and every one of their teams that tested FA got nothing more than 2nd-rounders in return for losing their star. Chris Paul/Josh Smith/Bynum this summer can just sign a contract with whoever they want to sign with. Portland will likely get NO compensation at all--maybe not even a 2nd-rounder and a trade exception, since it doesn't make sense in the new CBA to S&T anything for max-ish players anymore (they can't get longer contracts or higher raises). So if the Mavericks--or anyone else-- offer him a contract (doesn't actually matter the amount), POR can't do anything about it when he signs it, and not only do they not have their all-star PF anymore, but they don't have young players, draft picks, or cap space to replace him.

    Lillard, otoh, is on a rookie deal through summer 2016. He will almost certainly be extended for 5 years, in the summer/fall of 2015, meaning that he will be on the Blazers (unless traded) until 2021. He can't do anything about it. Even if he ISN'T extended, it would be the same situation as Batum last summer---it doesn't matter if your heart's in MIN, you will be matched and playing here, unless someone sweetens the pot enough in an S&T to have POR let him go. Whoever is drafted with the 3rd and 10th picks are in the same situation, plus one year (extensions in fall of 2016 or RFA in 2017).

    You don't want Oladipo or McLemore or Porter (or Melo or Gasol or Harden or Horford or Deron or Gordon or Beal) for 9 minutes? Wow.
     
  11. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Are you being deliberately obtuse in this? Aldridge for Thompson, #3 and #19? Or did I just get trolled hard?
     
  12. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    All of those players you mentioned are all primodonna players
     
  13. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    that word doesn't mean what you think it means, especially if you're applying it to Al Horford and Beal and Oladipo and Porter and...nevermind.
     
  14. Blaze01

    Blaze01 JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,106
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I don't think it is a foregone conclusion that LA will stay when his contract is up, so POR would be foolish IMO to not at least explore or listen to what teams like CLE, OKC, HOU etc might be willing to offer for him...all 3 of those teams BTW have multiple young players\picks to potentially add to a deal as well, which IMO could be enticing to POR...

    Thompson BTW is a good young prospect, only 22 years old....I don't think his ceiling is Aldridge level but a 15-17, 8-10 guy, maybe a little more is certainly possible....and at #3 POR could get a guy like Noel, McLemore, Oladipo, Bennett and at #19 they could get another nice young player as well....IF I were POR I would ask for Zeller in the deal as well.....

    I don't think that is a bad return at all for LA....consider that UTA got D.Harris, D.Favors, and 2 1st round picks (Kanter being one player they took and #21 this year)....
     
  15. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How often do players retire with the team that drafted them?
     
  16. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,214
    Likes Received:
    15,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thompson is undersized as is Bennett. Don't want either one as a starter. Nor do I like Porter who is raw as they come.

    So if Noel and McLemore go 1, 2 then really what we are talking about is LMA for Oladipo and #19.
    That does not excite me. I have no problem trading LMA, but they would have to be pretty damn sure Oladipo is all that. That particular scenario seems too risky.
     
  17. BigGameDamian

    BigGameDamian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Messages:
    33,143
    Likes Received:
    13,312
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Blazers already have a franchise player in Lillard and 2 side kicks in Aldridge and Batum. They are ready to make the next jump and this draft will not help.
     
  18. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That quite frankly makes no sense whatsoever.
     
  19. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Not many; but I think Aldridge is loyal to his team. He seems he's all about the team. But whatever man. Let's just say his best years will be one as a blazer.
     
  20. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Lolwut?!
     

Share This Page