Aldridge / Lopez /T. Rob minute share

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by magnifier661, Jul 25, 2013.

  1. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    First off.... Welcome to the forum! The more the merrier!

    Okay, lets assume we give Leonard 10-15 minutes a game; but apply that to the PF minutes. We should still move Aldridge as the center reserve. I think Leonard playing PF is better suited for his type of game. That could still give Robinson and Leonard shared duties for both PF/C of around 33 minutes. 10-15 minutes for Leonard and 20-25 minutes for T. Rob.
     
  2. OneLifeToLive

    OneLifeToLive Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2012
    Messages:
    5,620
    Likes Received:
    517
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well...Thanks. It's good to be here.

    I think Meyers and his body better are suited at five. This doesn't mean I am opposed to see him play some four but I think a larger percentage of his minutes needs to be at five. I mean that's why we acquired him I'm thinking.
     
  3. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    31,701
    Likes Received:
    24,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm sorry, logic wasn't the right word...
     
  4. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,612
    Likes Received:
    27,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Now that is a straw man. ;)
     
  5. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am willing to bet a cool nickel (outside chance you'll never get it if I win) that Aldridge is gone before the season
     
  6. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,612
    Likes Received:
    27,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He's a 2nd year C who is 20 years old. He doesn't have a type of game yet.
     
  7. blazedanugz

    blazedanugz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2010
    Messages:
    2,217
    Likes Received:
    1,550
    Trophy Points:
    113
    mags im sorry I have to be the one to tell you but I think sometime before the start of the season you are going to have to accept that Meyers is going to get decent minutes at the back up center position. probably before LMA plays center..
     
  8. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    20,004
    Likes Received:
    17,238
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
    Good thing you know nothing

    And thus why we have to give him consistent minutes to develop
     
  9. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Actually no, that was in response to the "straw man argument" that we should have traded Aldridge for a rebounder; because I said Leonard needs to rebound more. Maybe you didn't catch that?
     
  10. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Yes it wasn't. At least you are understanding better now.
     
  11. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Does anyone really think Aldridge, Lopez and Robinson are all going to play 82 games? I’d say that’s pretty freaking unlikely. So at some point Meyers will get opportunities to prove himself in extended minutes.
     
  12. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,649
    Likes Received:
    20,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    I was with you until you said: "if he is the 'star' many say he is going to be...". Who the hell said Myers Leonard is going to be a star? I'm a Leonard supporter, and I think he has a lot of potential, and I think he needs minutes to develop, but he will never be a "star". If he were that good, he'd show it already.
     
  13. OneLifeToLive

    OneLifeToLive Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2012
    Messages:
    5,620
    Likes Received:
    517
    Trophy Points:
    113

    First of all, it wasn't me. I don't think he is that kind of material.

    But JC is one of them.

    He's out of position too often. He's awkward at times, and the only thing that's consistent about his game is that it's reliably inconsistent. In fact, the Trail Blazers spent a good portion of their summer seeking a player who could make him a back-up. But every time I see Meyers Leonard on the basketball floor I believe he will one day be the answer in Portland.

    Leonard turned 21 last NBA season. And if you want to polarize your next cocktail party, wait for a lull, and ask for a show of hands of those who believe Leonard will one day start a playoff game at center for the Blazers. Because this city is no longer Eastside vs. Westside. It's not hipsters vs. yuppies. As division goes, there are those who believe Leonard will blossom, and those who think he's a stiff.

    I see a star.


    If he is star material you think he could be, you need to find him time especially in a year where I think you can be a lil more generous with it. You can play it just the way Mags is suggesting it. Bench Meyers or play him 5 mins a game and still come up short of the playoffs under that dynamic.
     
  14. BigGameDamian

    BigGameDamian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Messages:
    33,189
    Likes Received:
    13,346
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You may be correct. The Blazers may just be waiting for a better offer. I think it would have to be a 3 way deal if the Blazers grant him his wish and send him to a team in Texas. Bit it wouldn't surprise me if talks are in the works behind the scenes.
     
  15. OneLifeToLive

    OneLifeToLive Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2012
    Messages:
    5,620
    Likes Received:
    517
    Trophy Points:
    113

    I think the whole idea of Aldridge going public about not wanting to be traded was to help the Blazers bargaining leverage. And it wouldn't surprise me if he was told by Neil Olshey or his agent to do it.
     
  16. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I hear this idea an awful lot that Portland can send Aldridge to Texas and get youth from a 3rd team.

    Well what the hell team has valuable youth for the spare parts of the Texas teams? I just don’t see any assets on those Texas teams that makes sense directly or indirectly for Aldridge.
     
  17. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why would Aldridge want the Blazers to get more in return for trading him? That would weaken the team he goes to. That’s why players are encouraged to make their demands public like Melo, CP3 and Howard did.
     
  18. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Only Houston / Detroit idea seems the best for me.

    Pieces coming back asik / Monroe / parsons and probably a couple first rounders. Send out Aldridge / batum / maybe Barton.
     
  19. OneLifeToLive

    OneLifeToLive Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2012
    Messages:
    5,620
    Likes Received:
    517
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There can only be a deal if both teams agree to it. What are the chances Portland agrees to a deal that is lopsided one direction due to them being held hostage by LA's trade demands?

    He can only go if Portland allows it. Therefore he has to work for them to make it happen. Don't believe Portland is going to just let him go. They will hold on to him for however long it takes. Not sure LA is on board with that.
     

Share This Page