Voting! Oh well if it were up to me, the age needed would be 21 with photo ID and a certified, Notarized competency certificated.
That liberal canard got us all these low information ballet casters. A Twenty year old maybe as hard as rock but his head will be a little softer.
Yeah, this whole keeping things in perspective, and how mentioning Hitler kind of undermines your argument? I can't imagine what I was talking about.
Perfect example of why the death penalty is bad and why abortions should be legal. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_of_George_Spencer
It's not about approval, it's about if you want people to actually listen to what you say and take it seriously, try not incorporating Hitler, or making weird ass "what ifs" to prove a point. If you have to go to that level, your point isn't strong.
The people need to make the decision. There is no such thing as "pro choice". It is a human rights issue, and society needs to determine when it is a human.
Call it abortion or the death penalty but the new neighbor on the corner keeps parking his gay lifted ford COCK compensator truck in front of the stop sign by his house. He is as evil as Hitler and needs to die. I don't mean gay as a homophobic term, just that people that drive those trucks are almost as gay as Harley guy who revs his gay motorcycle all the time. See South Park for further info.
if he is obstructing a stop sign I'm sure he could be cited under motor vehicle code 27a3, which reads "Within thirty feet of, and upon the approach to, any flashing beacon, stop sign, or traffic control device;" Then he could protest the citation in court if he desired as according to the us constitution.
when did I ask for a clarification? If you re read the post you quoted, I was pointing out the difference.
After reading through this thread a self realization on what a terrible person I am . . . I am pro-choice and pro death penalty.
The odd thing that I see here is people want to argue the right or wrong of a single issue, but fail to defend both. Some of the most interesting posts have been to compare Hitler to abortion. One could make the argument that more have been murdered in the name of abortion than have died in the concentration or death camps. The only other consistent thing of notice is that the few who I expected to perhaps give a reasonable explanation, have avoided any real dialogue, and chosen to pick nits and deflect issues.
The thing is… If the baby is actually considered "a baby"; then it is murder. The question is… "Why do they assume the fetus is not a baby yet?" What explanation do they give?
