OT: Anonymous GM: Best Way For Us To Grab Superstar Is Tanking

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by BigGameDamian, Oct 29, 2013.

  1. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    One thing that the people who are bringing up the Kings, Clips etc. are missing is the opportunity. I'm sure that 29 teams in 2007 wanted Oden, and given the 2nd pick with Oden off the board, 28 wanted Durant. Doesn't matter if ATL's GM just knew that Durant would blow up and be a super-stud and be better than Horford. He didn't have the chance. He had to roll with less-sure/lower-ceiling options.

    Joe Dumars messed up in taking Darko over Wade/Melo/Bosh. But he had that chance. DEN got lucky and took Melo. Doesn't matter if TOR knew that Bosh wasn't going to be as prolific as Melo, they didn't have the chance to get him.

    You can go down the list. People keep bringing up Webster and CP3 and will until the end of time. But we had the opportunity. the Jazz had the opportunity to trade with us because they had a good pick as well. The L*kers, for instance, couldn't say "Man, we really want CP3/Deron next to K*be--let's get him!" They didn't have the opportunity with their pick or assets enough to trade for him.

    As the draft progresses, it becomes more of a crapshoot. Lots of us wanted Drummond or Barnes with our pick in the 2012 draft. But we didn't have the opportunity. Would you rather have Drummond and 3 more losses in 2011-12, or Leonard? And there's much less of a chance that Drummond becomes a HoF than, say, Davis. The Knicks really wanted Steph Curry with the 8th pick, but they didn't have the chance because GSW won one fewer game than they did, and were stuck with Jordan Hill.

    There are myriad permutations and ways to get good, but one of them is that you need superstars. It's significantly harder (due in large part to opportunity) to get a superstar the later you draft. Not impossible, as has been shown by multiple teams. But bringing up Kings/Clippers/Nash's drafting to state why winning an extra couple games a year doesn't matter isn't really making the same argument.
     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2013
  2. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    The point I'm making is even with the best picks a superstar is as much of a crap shoot. Who would have thought CP3 was better than the first 5 players picked before him? It seemed those teams GMs did…

    And think of the year we actually won the #1 pick… We had a 1.5% chance. The time we did tank, we dropped all the way to 4th, when we had the best shot at #1.

    Then as I've mentioned so many times before, our very own team was playoff bound each and every year for 5 straight years before we built a team to reach the WCF, and the 1999 team wasn't "The Best Team Money Can Buy".

    Yes, you have greater odds to pick up a better player, but I say that teams have contended for years, being a small market and not being in the lotto.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 29, 2013
  3. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That means the more teams trying to compete for a title the less effective competing is too....right?
     
  4. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, I think that MIL wanted a big, and ATL wanted "upside" with pedigree. UTH liked Deron's skillset more than a smaller guy who just punched someone in the nuts. :dunno: But the 26 other teams in the league didn't even have a chance at that crapshoot. Their crapshoot was "Joey Graham or Danny Granger"? And since TOR was dumb/unlucky, IND picked up a very good player. The Spurs' crapshoot that year was "Ian Mahinmi or Wayne Simien?" Counted much less towards their future championships than if they'd had the opportunity that TOR had.

    Well, actually it was 5.3%, but whatever.

    Which one of our 1993-1999 teams would you say was a "contender", and would that have changed if, say, in 1996 you'd decided to lose 3 more games and have the opportunity to pick K*be, Peja or Nash instead of the crapshoot of Jermaine?
     
  5. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I agree, at that time it was a fine strategy. The only talent we had on the team was a selfish Zach Randolph. We didn’t have a player of Aldridge’s talent. We didn’t have a young promising player of Lillards abilities. We didn’t have a borderline all-star of Batum’s level.

    I don’t agree tanking is right for building a team all the time nor is it always the wrong strategy. Optimal strategy is somewhere in the middle, it is fluid, and it is ever changing. Optimal strategies depend on what talents are on the roster. It depends on what other teams in the league are doing. When others are zigging its better to zag. If multiple teams start to tank there is less of a benefit for the next team to duplicate that strategy.
     
  6. BigGameDamian

    BigGameDamian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Messages:
    33,193
    Likes Received:
    13,350
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If we lose Aldridge it better be for the #1 pick in the draft or like a young promising proven stud like Durant.
     
  7. The_Lillard_King

    The_Lillard_King Westside

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,405
    Likes Received:
    310
    Trophy Points:
    83
    If Blazers become the next Charlotte Bobcats of the NBA . .. . that is just about what it would take to cancel my tickets and find another NBA team to adopt.

    Tanking may get a superstar, but it's bad business in my book.
     
  8. KingSpeed

    KingSpeed Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    63,208
    Likes Received:
    22,400
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    actor
    Location:
    New York
    Everything you've posted is wrong. 2005-06, we won more than twenty games. 21, I believe. 2006-07, we won 32 games. 2011-12, we won only 28 games. Last season, we won 33.
     
  9. KingSpeed

    KingSpeed Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    63,208
    Likes Received:
    22,400
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    actor
    Location:
    New York
    As for tanking, we should all be rooting for the Lakers to get 8th seed this season. I don't want them getting a great player in the draft to go with all their caproom for signing free agents. Could turn Lakers into a monster again.
     
  10. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Oh so the basketball reference links are wrong?
     
  11. KingSpeed

    KingSpeed Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    63,208
    Likes Received:
    22,400
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    actor
    Location:
    New York
    You misread them. Look again.
     
  12. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Well the point remains the same. 21 or 16 wins, it still sucks. The other years did too.
     
  13. BigGameDamian

    BigGameDamian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Messages:
    33,193
    Likes Received:
    13,350
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Aldridge for Durant swap would be interesting. Not saying it would happen but it would be interesting.
     
  14. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Wtf?!?! First of all, you posted the OG, so you know what the topic should be. Then you throw out something that has zero chance of happening in mid thread. Dude wtf man?!?!

    There is no point talking about this swap because it will never ever ever happen this season.
     
  15. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    20,005
    Likes Received:
    17,238
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
    MAGS. You just called out Brian for getting trolled by Kingspeed. Take your own advice brotha!
     
  16. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Play to win. You never know until the actual games are played. The rest is speculation.

    Bulls grabbed the pick used on Deng from Phoenix. They sold it to save cap space the year they signed Nash.

    Noah was a middling pick. Taj Gibson and Jimmy Butler in the upper 20s. They had physical attributes that fit the team's system; they weren't heralded can't miss guys. Played in big time winning programs.

    Draft smart, no matter the position you finish. Think two or three years ahead with your contract positions.

    Winners win. Those are the guys you want. So win.
     
  17. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    BGD isn't a troll. He is actually serious. Kingspeed is fucking around
     
  18. KingSpeed

    KingSpeed Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    63,208
    Likes Received:
    22,400
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    actor
    Location:
    New York
    Westbrook/Batum/Aldridge combo might be a better combo than what they currently have. We trade Batum and Aldridge for Durant/Lamb and whatever.

    Blazers with Lillard/Lamb/Durant/Robinson/Lopez would meet Thunder (Westbrook/Sefalosha/Batum/Aldridge/Thabeet) in WCF.
     
  19. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes! Especially in the west, there are fewer elite teams competing for a title than I ever remember. Many years at this time in October there will not yet be any teams tanking. The NBA has never had this much competition for tanking, so it appears to be very poor timing to duplicate that strategy.
     
  20. BigGameDamian

    BigGameDamian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Messages:
    33,193
    Likes Received:
    13,350
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We might be like the Atlanta Hawks of the 80's.
     

Share This Page