The Bench

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Rastapopoulos, Dec 3, 2013.

  1. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,976
    Likes Received:
    57,106
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    That would make more sense.
     
  2. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,775
    Likes Received:
    27,531
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is correct. However, trading Leonar_ and Claver for bench depth up front would be a good move. Any 3.5 million vet bigs out there on teams that are tanking?
     
  3. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,324
    Likes Received:
    43,685
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Brendan Haywood? Out due to injury right now, but projected to come back around new years. 7', 260, $2M salary.
    Aaron Gray? Doesn't appear to be playing for Toronto. Is he injured? 7', 270. $2.5M salary. 28 years old
    Tyler Hansbrough? Playing 21 mpg for the Raps. $3.1M salary. Might he be available?
    Jason Maxiell? Undersized, but plays like a big. 6'7", 260, $2M salary.
     
  4. BlazerCaravan

    BlazerCaravan Hug a Bigot... to Death

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    28,071
    Likes Received:
    10,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What about Chris Kamen? He's getting no run with his current team.
     
  5. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,775
    Likes Received:
    27,531
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Definitely not the guy, IMO
     
  6. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,775
    Likes Received:
    27,531
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Maybe Anderson Vaginajao. That might be the type of player I am thinking about.
     
  7. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If he could ever get/stay healthy I'd be be happy with Raggedy Andy ... Then again Varejao and Lopez on the same team, there's gotta be a rule about two guys with that hair being on the same team.
     
  8. Fez Hammersticks

    Fez Hammersticks スーパーバッド Zero Cool

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    29,150
    Likes Received:
    9,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Phone Psychic
    Location:
    The Deep State, US and A.
    They are trying to make the playoffs for their LeBron pitch this summer.

    We gotta look at teams rebuilding or on the verge of one.

    I think we are one key player away and I think Hawes could be had, just as long as we keep CJ. Neil will have to really sell the potential of Leonard and Robinson.
     
  9. ripcityboy

    ripcityboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2013
    Messages:
    12,934
    Likes Received:
    10,797
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    self employed
    Location:
    pdx, or, usa.
    It will be interesting to see where CJ fits. I don't see him getting big minutes until he proves he's completely healthy. Sad to see the
    Blazers waste a draft slot since they don't have one this year.
     
  10. Fez Hammersticks

    Fez Hammersticks スーパーバッド Zero Cool

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    29,150
    Likes Received:
    9,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Phone Psychic
    Location:
    The Deep State, US and A.
    Huh? CJ was top-5 in scoring his last two years and was also the most efficient scorer in college basketball. I think he's the SGOTF.
     
  11. ripcityboy

    ripcityboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2013
    Messages:
    12,934
    Likes Received:
    10,797
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    self employed
    Location:
    pdx, or, usa.
    Has he been healthy too??
     
  12. cdub503

    cdub503 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,862
    Likes Received:
    416
    Trophy Points:
    83
    any idea of when hes supposed to be coming back? should be pretty soon right?
     
  13. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    41,767
    Likes Received:
    26,109
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
  14. BlazerCaravan

    BlazerCaravan Hug a Bigot... to Death

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    28,071
    Likes Received:
    10,384
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Dorell man... Damn. Can we give Crabbe some run instead of him?
     
  15. Strenuus

    Strenuus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    50,466
    Likes Received:
    35,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's starting to feel like a static rotation. I understand it, but I'd love to just see some other options come out. Put Crabbe out there with Dame and Mo or something. He might help out on a broken play here and there. Just something. I know what we have is generally working, and I don't want to mess up the starters at all... but at least the 2nd unit needs some fine tuning.
     
  16. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I still have hopes for T. Rob, especially since we really didn't give up anything to get him. I think he is a long way from being anything we can count on. We really need a center in a big way. Freeland moving to PF and a true back-up center would do wonders for this bench.

    Mo are beyond a disappointment to me.

    Mo is giving up 6.9 PER against his opponents, while Wright actually has a +1.8 PER against the players he faces. Freeland is a -8.3, but that's because he's playing center instead of PF.
     
  17. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Wright is a +1.8 PER against players he faces. He is a - during the game because he's with shitty bench team. He isn't the reason why our bench sucks.
     
  18. BlazerCaravan

    BlazerCaravan Hug a Bigot... to Death

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    28,071
    Likes Received:
    10,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Good point, and the Last 10 Games paradigm is skewed a bit because one of the games had a 32-point deficit in it.

    However: every single person in our bench rotation is under 15 PER, which i normalized to be as good as the average player on an average team, which would be the 8th player (7 better, 7 worse) on that hypothetical team. So our big problem in my opinion is that our 6th and 7th men are actually playing like 9th or 10th men. Our garbage man PF is the most efficient in the bench rotation, but even he's only around the 8th.

    We need a better, more consistent shooter off the bench. Maybe two.
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2013
  19. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I 100% agree with you. Mo is not the 6th man we need. I think a player like Hawes would do wonders for our bench. We would be able to slide freeland to his natural position at PF and our bench can spread the floor just as well as if we had Aldridge with Hawes.

    I know Korver is out of the question now, but could you imagine if we had Korver and Hawes coming off the bench, instead of Mo and Freeland?
     
  20. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    41,767
    Likes Received:
    26,109
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
    Why would you give any credence to the notion of "PER against"? I mean, it's obviously bullshit in an age where they got rid of illegal defense rules and defense is a team effort.

    (EDIT: I would retract this criticism if it was ACTUALLY calculated by tracking (using them fancy new cameras) whomever, in this case, Wright, was "responsible" for at any time (and only for the time he's responsible for that player) and amalgamating all those stats together, rather than, as I suspect, working out the PER of the SF on the other team.)
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2013

Share This Page