Knicks open to trading Tyson Chandler, Blazers Interested

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by OSUBlazerfan, Jan 17, 2014.

  1. Reep

    Reep Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,545
    Likes Received:
    3,569
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    South Jordan, UT
    I forgot about his connection with Stotts. I wonder if that has any impact.
     
  2. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    No. He's awesome backup for $6M. You want to play Chandler enough so he's ready for playoffs.
     
  3. BlazerCaravan

    BlazerCaravan Hug a Bigot... to Death

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    28,071
    Likes Received:
    10,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I like Lopez over Chandler at the end of games because he's a good foul shooter. Tyson's a career 64% FT shooter, and is a risk at the end of games. But the wastelands of mid-quarters? We need another anchor and Tyson is that guy.
     
  4. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    31,701
    Likes Received:
    24,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, but he's also a defensive anchor when healthy. He will help stave off Durant/Harden/Westbrook wild drives to the rim and won't get as many fouls called on him because of his defensive reputation.
     
  5. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,324
    Likes Received:
    43,685
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Any value to the thought process that keeping GSW from getting him is an important consideration here as well?
     
  6. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,711
    Likes Received:
    56,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    Absolutely. It was bad enough that they landed JO in the summer. Now with him out for the season, they can't get Chandler to play behind Bogut. We can't allow it to happen
     
  7. KeepOnRollin

    KeepOnRollin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    11,498
    Likes Received:
    5,679
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    North Idaho
    Who do they have that they would trade for Chandler? They have to get at least 11 MIL going out I believe.
     
  8. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, you do a deal if it helps make your team better. You don't make moves just to prevent other teams from making moves. Now if its a 15th man minimum salary for a month that will cost another team $10 million in cap space you'd have a point. But if we have to acquire a player with a $30 million salary it needs to help the team.
     
  9. TBpup

    TBpup Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    22,645
    Likes Received:
    34,632
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Investment Management / Financial Planner
    Location:
    Lake Oswego
    Is what we would get for what we would give up for Chandler at $14MM that much more than what we would get out of Hawes for so much less?

    :matrix:
     
  10. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Good point, they would have to break up their starting 5 which is not happening.
     
  11. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,324
    Likes Received:
    43,685
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ...assuming that Philly would give us Hawes for what we would want to send them...
     
  12. TBpup

    TBpup Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    22,645
    Likes Received:
    34,632
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Investment Management / Financial Planner
    Location:
    Lake Oswego
    Of course but I'm just looking at the amount of production for the cost in salary.

    ................Pts..Rebs...Asts...Blks...FG%...FT%...3pt%..Mins
    Chandler...7.9....7.5....1.3.....1.5... .567.. .617.. .000....26.7
    Hawes......14.4...8.7....3.5.....1.4... .488.. .775.. .437....32.1


    I think Chandler would change more shots even though their block rates are similar. Obviously Hawes has a huge advantage on the offensive end and even though his 3pt shooting is elite for a big man, it's his passing that intrigues me.

    :matrix:
     
  13. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hawes plays in a gimmick offense that has such a high pace it increases players stats and increases their efficiency. The team gives up a lot of points and losses by design. There is a reason Hawes, Thaddeus, and Turner are all having career years in both raw numbers and efficiency yet the team sucks.

    Defensive effect is very hard to measure statistically. Chandler is great in that regard, and you won't be able to find numbers to back it up.
     
  14. Wizard Mentor

    Wizard Mentor Wizard Mentor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    14,615
    Likes Received:
    14,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Master of Xen Foro
    Location:
    La Grande, OR
  15. TBpup

    TBpup Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    22,645
    Likes Received:
    34,632
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Investment Management / Financial Planner
    Location:
    Lake Oswego
    Yes he does but shooting .437 from '3' is not gimmick no matter what the pace. Also, assists from a big man are not fast-break oriented so those are legit as well. his rebounding numbers and points certainly are a bit elevated.

    :matrix:
     
  16. noknobs

    noknobs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    4,911
    Likes Received:
    6,292
    Trophy Points:
    113

    I like Freeland too, but Portland does that without blinking. New York on the other hand...
     
  17. cmeese47

    cmeese47 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,889
    Likes Received:
    86
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Really too much considering Meyers has been a bust and we got Robinson on the cheap the deal would be a steal for a former All Star, DPOY, 3x All NBA Def, Olympic Gold Medal Winner and NBA Champion. His 14 million dollar contract will be worth a fortune next year if he does not work out.

    Although we might need to get Philly involved since they have cap space and the Knicks do not have roster space for 4 players.
     
  18. Wizard Mentor

    Wizard Mentor Wizard Mentor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    14,615
    Likes Received:
    14,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Master of Xen Foro
    Location:
    La Grande, OR
    It saves them over $4.5 mil cash and another over $4.5 mil luxury tax. If they are over the tax for multiple years in a row there are some stiff penalties (BrianWA would know). The players we'd be giving them aren't horrible, they'd save $, Shrug.
     
  19. BlazerCaravan

    BlazerCaravan Hug a Bigot... to Death

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    28,071
    Likes Received:
    10,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It also helps them tank.
     
  20. Wizard Mentor

    Wizard Mentor Wizard Mentor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    14,615
    Likes Received:
    14,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Master of Xen Foro
    Location:
    La Grande, OR

Share This Page