15 questions evolutionists cannot adequately answer

I meant atoms ordering themselves into specific, repeated patterns.

 

I must rep someone else first.

Creationists are so damn boring. For decades they have been saying the same things over and over without bothering to find out if they are factually true. They smugly claim evolution violates the second law of thermodynamics when they have no idea what the second law says. They say evolution can't explain eyes when the explanation is in Origin of Species, which they never read.

Funny how you can't find any physicist who thinks evolution violates the second law, and I'd say physicists know a tad more about it than someone who never had physics 101. Like the stupid creationist said, I have a book written 2000 years ago and nothing discovered since matters. God, what a boring existence.

 

The Origin of Species is an interesting book, glad to hear you read that one. I just don't recall it saying much at all how the DNA code Originated. That was a very spectacular event, Life began. It has to rival the big Bang itself where all the elements known were spontaneously created in an instant of relative time. Do you have another book that delves a little deeper into the beginning of the genetic code where life began? I would find the book fascinating, probably read it cover to cover not stop.

 

Not me, I think it would be nice to be able to relieve yourself in the ally, after a night of drinking, without risking a public indecency charge.

Also nothing is worse than having to put the whole sexy time on hold while I run to bathroom and try to boner pee. The few minutes leading up to that are also very distracting, "can I finish, or do I need to stop?" Then trying to aim that thing is nearly impossible in that state.

Add that to the girls bathroom issues and I would say that this is definitely a design flaw in our general make up.

 

http://www.amazon.com/How-Life-Began-Evolutions-Geneses/dp/0226519317


Hope that helps, I haven't read it, but it seems to be exactly on the topic you want.

 

Hydrogen becomes helium. Helium becomes Lithium. Then we start getting Carbon, Neon, Oxygen, Silicon et cetera. From that point we have the building blocks for chemicals. With these chemicals, they start forming bonds based off of their electron cloud formations. It turns out that those bonds are not all equal in strength, and some break down under radiation. Ones that are more stable last longer, and have different traits. It's almost like chemicals undergo a "natural selection." Need I go on?

edit because Denny is pedantic.

 

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Eastoff again.

 

frigg off barb!

 

Please do, I am sure it will peek some interest. Myself, I prefer the Architecture rather than the nitty gritty of the building blocks.

 

Naw, this seems like just another dissertation on the old theme.

"followed by unicellular organisms half a millennia later. It is this version of genesis that Alexandre Meinesz explores in this engaging tale of life's origins and evolution."

No hint he knows the code nor has a clue on how to write more code.

 

So we're on the same page up until this point? You agree with all of what I've said so far?

 

No, I suspect you know more about of what your speaking of than I do. But I am not quite sure why you are saying it.

 

Okay, the first part about fusion creating heavier elements, do you know that already?

 

I have read of this, I also know that man causes U239 to be created from U235. Several more as I recall but I never really gain much interest in this area.
Except for when I was designing my ballast for my sailboat. The US government has tons of depleted Uranium stored in Oak Ridge and a some in Hanford.
Since it's specific density is about 170% of lead, I wanted to use some of that. They advertise on their website, to come up with some uses and it's yours.

Pure BS, they advertise one thing and do another. The Boss at Hanford told me, "It ain't going to happen". Plus, he needed to report me for trying. Funny, there was a manufacture that made high density cement with depleted Uranium in it. I tried to get some of that but it is no longer made period.

 

This lays out the problem with accepting the solutions put forth by the Progressives.

http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/global_warming/talk_conservative_climate_change.html

See solution # 2 is where they want to go. and there are big problems with this solution.

1. Concessions to China and India??? WTF?? China is already emitting more GHG than the next three top emitters on the list. India is projected to be number two with in a few years.

So if the US shoulders this burden, the best we could possible reduce would have little change to the total GHG but it would drastically change the lives of the US citizen.

2. Has anyone here actually read the Cap and Trade bill that was not enacted several years ago? Read it (I have) then tell me you want to sign up for this BS.
In short the average US Citizen will be paying heavy taxes on many things under this bill. However the "Poor" will make out like a bandit. The taxes will be used to upgrade the inner cities with all new energy using devices, new refrigerators, heating the apartments, cooling the apartments, new energy efficient windows, all wonderful if you have nothing. Not so damn good if you are a normal working person on the paying end instead of receiving.

3. Part of the higher fees you will pay will go to other countries to compensate for using their air
The US is not on the receiving end of this any where.

4.Obama would have us doing this while hoping China and India join in some day.

Read the damn thing before you are sucked into this scam. This is another wealth distribution scheme , to collect money to distribute for energy used. Not to reduce energy use.
Reducing energy use in a meaningful way, means less footprints much more than smaller footprints. This scheme just taxes the footprints more, even if their are smaller.

 

The climate change denial thread is next door. This is the evolution denial thread. You're starting to get confused old man. ;]