The home-run off-season

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by magnifier661, Jul 1, 2014.

Moderators: 6

Moderators

  1. BrianFromWA
  2. Chris Craig
  3. Darkwebs
  4. Ed O
  5. PtldPlatypus
  6. SlyPokerDog
Page 1 of 2
  1. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    1.) Set up a "sign and trade" with Cleveland, sending Freeland, Leonard and Claver for Hawes (7 mil).

    2.) Use the MLE to sign Chalmers

    3.) Use the 2.8 mil to sign Ryan Hollins (wait probably not even that much)

    Line-up includes:

    PG: Lillard, Chalmers, CJ
    SG: Matthews, CJ
    SF: Batum, Wright
    PF: Aldridge, The Beastman, Hawes
    Center: Lopez, Hawes, Ryan Hollins
     
    magnifier661, Jul 1, 2014
    #1
  2. JFizzleRaider

    JFizzleRaider Yeast Lords Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    14,185
    Likes Received:
    7,390
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Who Knows?
    Not a homerun. Hollins sucks and Chalmers is overrated.

    I think convincing hawes to sign for mle (sounds like Cleveland prefers cap instead of our poo poo platter.... Leonard, McCollum and wright might get it done).

    Buying out claver.

    Resigning Mo to 3/9

    And convincing a swing (carter, thabo, someone) to sign for the bae would be a home run
     
    JFizzleRaider, Jul 1, 2014
    #2
  3. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    16,057
    Likes Received:
    4,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    From what others have posted, Chalmers is worth more than Hawes, and thus won't be with us.
     
    Eastoff, Jul 1, 2014
    #3
  4. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I personally think Chalmers is more valuable than Hawes, but I doubt the rest of the league does. Centers are still the highest priced players. Unless you are a star wing.
     
    magnifier661, Jul 1, 2014
    #4
  5. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,000
    Likes Received:
    57,139
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I think Hawes, Pierce and Livingston would be a home run.
     
    Natebishop3, Jul 1, 2014
    #5
  6. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Even Pierce and Hawes would be home runs
     
    magnifier661, Jul 1, 2014
    #6
  7. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,000
    Likes Received:
    57,139
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I agree, but I'm still pining for Livingston :grin:
     
    Natebishop3, Jul 1, 2014
    #7
  8. JFizzleRaider

    JFizzleRaider Yeast Lords Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    14,185
    Likes Received:
    7,390
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Who Knows?
    Pierce, hawes and Mo ;)
     
    JFizzleRaider, Jul 1, 2014
    #8
  9. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Honestly, if you could land Hawes and Pierce; adding Mo wouldn't be as much of a problem. In fact, I think he could actually shine. Personally, I think a lot of Mo's out of control playing had more to do with having a seriously flawed offensive bench. Adding two key offensive players would open things up more.
     
    magnifier661, Jul 1, 2014
    #9
  10. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,000
    Likes Received:
    57,139
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    If we have to use all our money to get Pierce and Hawes, I would be fine with Mo coming back.
     
    Natebishop3, Jul 1, 2014
    #10
  11. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,324
    Likes Received:
    43,686
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't see how we could get both Pierce and Hawes--unless you are planning on a S&T for one of them. In that case, who are we losing, and what new hole do we need to fill?
     
    PtldPlatypus, Jul 1, 2014
    #11
  12. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Easy

    Leonard, Claver and Freeland for Hawes.
     
    magnifier661, Jul 1, 2014
    #12
  13. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,000
    Likes Received:
    57,139
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I think Hawes will be acquired through trade. Pierce would be MLE money.
     
    Natebishop3, Jul 1, 2014
    #13
  14. JFizzleRaider

    JFizzleRaider Yeast Lords Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    14,185
    Likes Received:
    7,390
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Who Knows?
    McCollum, Leonard and wright works
     
    JFizzleRaider, Jul 1, 2014
    #14
  15. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    16,057
    Likes Received:
    4,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    These are my ideal trade away pieces.
     
    Eastoff, Jul 1, 2014
    #15
  16. blue9

    blue9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    10,729
    Likes Received:
    7,169
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Mine too! Would love to cast those guys away - as long as we get some value in return for CJ, who I think has value/skill but doesn't fit our team.
     
    blue9, Jul 1, 2014
    #16
  17. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    16,057
    Likes Received:
    4,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    Exactly. I think Leonard and CJ both have promise, but we have other guys with proven talent right now. And Wright has a good history, but not with us.
     
    Eastoff, Jul 1, 2014
    #17
  18. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,000
    Likes Received:
    57,139
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I think we're setting ourselves up for another Jermaine O'Neal situation. I'm not sure Leonard will ever be as good as Jermaine, but he has tons of talent and we're fixing to put ourselves in a situation where we can't afford to play him because of how raw he is. I'm definitely concerned he'll go to some shitty team that can afford to play him big minutes and he'll become a good if not really good center.
     
    Natebishop3, Jul 1, 2014
    #18
  19. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,324
    Likes Received:
    43,686
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Would that make Monroe our new Dale Davis?
     
    PtldPlatypus, Jul 1, 2014
    #19
  20. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,000
    Likes Received:
    57,139
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Nah, Hawes would be Dale Davis, albeit much younger and specialized in a completely different area of the game.
     
    Natebishop3, Jul 1, 2014
    #20
Page 1 of 2

Share This Page