Blakey?

Obviously someone doesn't understand what a troll is. He's only goating you bro so he can whine and complain to the forum and mods for being attacked.

 

Just r e read the definition. Yes, homers can be a troll

 

Anyone can be a troll, but I disagree that someone is a troll simply because they're a blazer homer on a blazers forum. If you don't expect to see blindly faithful fans on the official forum of the Blazers (IE Mags), then I don't know what to tell you. That's like going to a hippy concert and not expecting to smell patchouli.

 

As do I. I dont think I said all homers are trolls. I simply said they can be and got attacked for it.

 

Can negative Nancy's who laugh at and passively ridicule homers be considered trolls?

 

Dude, you came in here and made a strawman post about top flight free agents, which you knew was going to draw negative attention. Of course you were attacked for it.

 

Yes

 

Like I attack ked eric with his asinine e guarantee thread? I got suspended for that and never called him a name. Consistency

 

Yup. Just ignore the fact that I'm going through the thread and cleaning it up. Roger that.

 

I don't see how papa g gets a perma ban and this guy can post this drivel over and over again. There comes a time when you must cut the chord.

 

I use the deal coming soon because you are such a "I told you so" kind of poster that is what I think about.

I think it's a great you tried to pass on information. I think the fact that try to come across that you ar bigger or better than blazer fans with your realistic attitude and than I told you so attitude, I just bring it back to reality that you don't know anything more than other Blazer fans. Sometimes you are wrong, sometimes you are right. . . and we will hear about it when you think you are right. Over and over and over . . .

 

And the award for "The poster that derails this thread" goes to MM. He needs to get another trophy case. His garage is already filled with these cups!

 

I don't see how anyone could poo-poo signing Blake to a reasonable contract, would be a good addition to the bench, can play a true PG role and is experienced.

 

Blake = Watson

If he wants to return, I wouldn't have a problem with him fulfilling that role.

 

Blake is better than Watson last year. I'd only sign him if Mo leaves

 

Dave McMenamin @mcten
Lakers GM Mitch Kupchak has also reached out to representatives for former PG Steve Blake, according to a league source

 

Personal attack. You stop and ill stop complaining

 

That seems like the same

 

Have you ever heard of a taco?

 

i'd take blake and billups if we get hawes or use our cap space on other positions. but ehhh. one year deals only to keep flexibility next year