The chronology of the Big Bang is well understood and well supported by objective evidence. Believe it or be wrong.
Sure, but you can't observe any live dinosaurs. You can conclude they once lived from the fossils. barfo
Big Bang and self replicating molecule from non genetic are far from each other. But knowing your debating skills, it's pretty obvious you didn't understand the question
Yep.. But the observation is "fossils found determine Dinos existed". When I watch the "behavior patterns" they aren't technically observable. Much of that information is an educated guess
And you should stop implying that atheists choose not to believe in god because they are afraid of being accountable for their actions. That's a little insulting, not to mention it doesn't make any logical sense.
I see a 3B year old rock. I wasn't around when it was formed. Nobody was. Yet we all know better that it is 3B years old and that it was formed by natural processes. I see even barfo is mopping the floor with your arguments . Good luck with that. You seem to accept the fossil record but deny the fossil record of the cosmos.
We're wrong about half the things we study here on this planet, but we have the universe nailed down. How it started, where it came from, and where it's going.
Hahaha all you keep doing are giving only non-genetic examples. As for the fossil records, they explain they existed. That is an obvious observation. Your weak argument that we see self replication today is proof that genetic life can manifest from non genetic material, not so much. I do enjoy when you hitch rides from other posters, especially ones you argue with on a daily basis, very rewarding...
