I used the definition because you clearly don't understand the word. "1 : tending to excite anger, disorder, or tumult : " Your "tea party" fucking shit up, was a move to excite anger. I can't help that you were on reply quick on the draw before I could paste the quote. Do you see that I used your quote soon enough to avoid an edit alert?
they aren't fucking things up? It was their actions that have caused many republicans to lose their jobs, ran horrible candidates for president (which just made the republicans who actually did stand a chance at running, unable to run and potentially win), they pretty much ruined the credit rating, they send out crazy chain emails meant to scare people, and they run the republican party and have caused them (as a whole) to move to the right far more than the rest of the country is. So, that's not inflammatory. That's an aggressive description of what they've done. calling them racist, tin foil wearing loons who sleep with their sisters, THAT is inflammatory.
Says you... But I see that you will even defend Obama today. So the "subjective reasoning" could be a little cloudy. And btw, I'm not even tea party, but I want to make sure your bigotry was exposed.
we're not arguing. I'm typing and randomly putting words together in what the french called "sent-ton-sez"
I will accept being called a bigot, if you yourself admit you're bigoted too...because otherwise it's just like using big words to try to irritate someone, when you actually don't understand the true meaning of the words. Like how racism is thrown around willy nilly. It pretty much voids the word of it's true meaning.
