There are no numbers in Godel's "proof", now are there? Hint: to answer this, you might need to read it and try to understand it. There are lots of numbers in physical chemistry. Duh.
Yep and the atheists of today are like the Religious leaders of then. Thank you for proving my point. See athiests will refute to no end, even if something logical presents itself. And because of that, they will refuse to give a second thought to anything "unnaturalist". So they may not "burn people at the steak", but they definitely won't proceed in any observations if they believe it may help prove God exists.
"For the scientist that has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountain of ignorance. He is about to conquer the highest peak. As he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries." ~Robert Jastrow
“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.” -- Stephen Roberts I win again!
As I have pointed out earlier, barfo and many others you've tried to debate, call this statement conceding on your part. Simple answer: when you say "you are just wrong" means really. I don't have a logical reply or links to support your reply, so I'm going to tell you that you are wrong.
I found it easier to state the obvious than to point out every sentence in your post was wrong individually. Like your absolute and absurd sentence about atheists and logic.
I 100% agree with him. I would only reply; "generalizing all theist in this matter is dangerous". I would also say "then I would recommend you taking your own advice"
