Dame and CJ long term - has your opinion changed?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Natebishop3, Mar 2, 2016.

?

Can CJ and Dame work long term?

  1. Yes - I could see them as a long term package

    29 vote(s)
    93.5%
  2. No - I still think we will need to cash in on CJ at some point

    2 vote(s)
    6.5%
  1. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,976
    Likes Received:
    57,109
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Stole this idea from Mook. He basically said that he didn't think that a Dame/CJ backcourt could work long term, but that his opinion has changed over the course of the season.

    I'm still on the fence. I really like CJ, and I think he's a very good player. I think he could be an All-Star at some point. I'm still skeptical of this working long term. Zach Lowe brought up this subject, and said, "This is why some executives on other teams have kicked around the possibility of Portland eventually including McCollum in a megadeal for some disgruntled star -- a path Olshey isn't considering now."

    I think if the right deal came along, I'd still move CJ, but it would have to be for a star. Someone like Paul George or Cousins.
     
    Dan Marang likes this.
  2. KeepOnRollin

    KeepOnRollin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    11,498
    Likes Received:
    5,679
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    North Idaho
    Yes for me it has slightly. But that is because I see their defense improving on a weekly basis. Dame might have hit right at average now at this point of the season so I see him being at least slightly above average next year.

    CJ is probably slightly under average at this point but he was almost horrendous at the beginning of the year and I think he is at worst average next year. And the year after? Sky is the limit for these guys.

    With that said, yes there are some players I would trade CJ for. Cousins, Butler, George, Favors, etc. But those are probably pipe dreams and I am not settling for much (if any) less.

    I always knew they were a great pair on Offense which some people thought wasn't true either because they are sort of similar in what they try to do.
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2016
  3. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    31,701
    Likes Received:
    24,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I've always thought Dame and CJ was a long-term pairing. The game is evolving, guys like Dame and CJ are the future, and we have both. Conventional wisdom has to be taken with a grain of salt. If I told you a few years ago that a championship team would be starting 6'7 Draymond Green at center you would have laughed at me and slapped me across the face.

    Would I trade him for Paul George? Sure, but that's because PG is a better player, not because I'm inherently against the idea of a small backcourt.
     
    BonesJones, PDXFonz, BBert and 5 others like this.
  4. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,324
    Likes Received:
    43,685
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I've been amazed at how well they play together. Next year, I could legitimately see them averaging over 50 ppg combined. We've got enough size and length on the wings and on the bench to complement and cover them defensively, and they're just so hard to handle on the offensive end, that I can legitimately see them as a championship-caliber backcourt.
     
    GoBlazersGo likes this.
  5. BlazerCaravan

    BlazerCaravan Hug a Bigot... to Death

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    28,071
    Likes Received:
    10,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No - I always saw them as our long term package.

    EDIT: I see you have a different question in the poll than the thread. D'oh!
     
    Draco likes this.
  6. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The NBA has changed where big physical guards are less beneficial. Teams really need more than one ball creator. Look at the Clippers with CP3; when he leaves the game the team has major issues. Even when he plays he gets worn out trying to create all the time. Last year when teams trapped us they could completely remove Dame out of plays. It very beneficial having CJ to pair with Dame. Our fast breaks are so much more effective. I cringed when Wes was leading a break. Now its easy to find Dame or CJ.

    It gives us tons of front court flexibility not having to worry about shot creation or multi faceted offensive players. We can surround Dame and CJ with limited offense players who are elite defenders. Dame and CJ both contribute on defense; yes they're below average but its not as if they're Jose Calderon out there getting burned. They make plays. I expect CJ to improve more as this is his first season starting; he's actually much better than Lillard was initially on defense.

    I've always thought they would be a great long term duo so yes I still believe that. Toot my own horn I was really right about this one. Please don't look at my Harrision "Fucking" Barnes thread where I thought we made a mistake at the Lillard draft though...
     
    Tunchi, GriLtCheeZ, e_blazer and 2 others like this.
  7. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,192
    Likes Received:
    15,646
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No my opinion has not changed because I thought it would work from the start, based on how the league was evolving.
    As long as you have other guards on the team (i.e Crabbe.Henderson) who you can turn to in the rare occasion where you need to go bigger, then I just don't see why it won't work.

    CJ may not be perfect to pair with Dame, but he is pretty damn close. His ball handling for a SG allows Dame to essentially shift from PG to SG and back to PG seamlessly. Sure it would be perfect if either (or both for that matter) were lock down defenders, but then you are talking about having two hall of fame type players, and that is not realistic.

    This can be one of the best back courts in the league. They just need to make sure they have the right 3rd guard to cover every possible match up scenario.
     
    GoBlazersGo likes this.
  8. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Don't remember all these CJ supporters before... I had a heck of a time arguing that he would and should start over Hendo. You could see in the second half of last season and the playoffs he was legit and our second most valuable piece to this team.

    In general fans focus way too much on positions though. Basketball is about having 5 players on the court. Positions were invented so layman can understand the game.
     
    Natebishop3 and B-Roy like this.
  9. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,187
    Likes Received:
    30,322
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    I used to be in the camp where I thought CJ was a quality 6th man-type of player. I thought that Henderson or Crabbe would start and CJ would come off of the bench at both PG and SG. He's proved to be just too darned good for that type of role. It works when he and Lillard are on the court together and it works equally well when he slides to the PG spot and they bring a bigger 2G off the bench. That flexibility and talent are why I've become a believer in this backcourt as a long-term pairing.
     
    Orion Bailey and Draco like this.
  10. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,976
    Likes Received:
    57,109
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    The question in the thread title is to stimulate conversation, the question in the poll is to see exactly where people stand. :devilwink:
     
    BlazerCaravan likes this.
  11. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,976
    Likes Received:
    57,109
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    The biggest development, in my opinion, is CJ's ability to play point guard. Sure, he's not as good as Dame, and there are some fans that would rather have Tim Frazier (shudders) because he can pass the ball, but I think CJ has shown enough proficiency that we haven't needed a backup point guard. That opens up a lot of minutes and has allowed Terry to find enough time for both Crabbe and Hendo.

    I will also say that it's nice to have two guys that can create their own shot and can put the team on their back when we need points. Dame lit up the Knicks in the first half, and CJ lit them up in the second half.
     
    GoBlazersGo likes this.
  12. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah I was one of the bigger CJ supporters but we still didn't know how he'd respond because he'd never been a consistent 25+ mpg player at the top of other teams scouting reports.

    He has played great and exceeded the vast majority of expectations. I thought his PPG would be close to where they are but I didn't think he'd be this efficient right away. Really just thought he'd end up forcing shots on a bad offensive team; and get high scoring by default. But he's really a great player.

    One thing I never understood is people thinking he couldn't play backup PG. He has had sick handles his whole career. Stotts offense moves the ball around all backcourt players. Then the same people thought he couldn't play starting SG. As if the only role he could ever have was 10mpg as a backup undersized SG.
     
  13. EL PRESIDENTE

    EL PRESIDENTE Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    50,346
    Likes Received:
    22,532
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes. We're seeing what a Lillard and Brandon Roy duo would be like.
     
    GoBlazersGo and Pinwheel1 like this.
  14. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    68,295
    Likes Received:
    67,308
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Early on in the season I was on the fence about CJ...thought he was a tweener, defensively challenged, couldn't finish in the paint, make free throws, etc...when Dame sat out 7 games and we won most of them, I ate my CJ crow and saw he'd improved all the areas of concern....he's also stayed healthy which was a concern...he proved me wrong and I gladly ate that nasty crow...now I'm a big fan of keeping Dame and CJ together
     
  15. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,976
    Likes Received:
    57,109
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    It's not so much about handles. I was skeptical of his ability to run the offense and distribute the ball. He hadn't done a very good job during his stints in summer league and he had really struggled when Stotts put him in at the point guard spot in garbage time. He still has issues with over dribbling and tunnel vision. Dame is definitely the superior player in that regard.
     
  16. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    31,701
    Likes Received:
    24,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sidenote, CJ is dazzlingly fun to watch. He is what Crawford would have been if Crawford had a brain.
     
    GoBlazersGo likes this.
  17. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    One thing thats been very impressive with CJ is his balance. He is able to square up instantly and get quick shots from all areas of the court. He talked about doing bikram Yoga and I bet thats played a huge part. He is much stronger and fit than as a rookie.
     
    GoBlazersGo likes this.
  18. PDXFonz

    PDXFonz I’m listening

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Messages:
    19,903
    Likes Received:
    16,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This poll is missing my voting option: No, I still think they can be legit.
     
    GoBlazersGo and BBert like this.
  19. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well yeah but Dame is in a tier with Steph, Wall and CP3.

    CJ was just as good or better than Westbrook, Jason Terry, Kyrie Irving, Isiah Thomas, Mo Williams at setting up an offense. Its very overrated for a starting PG, let alone limited minute backup PG. Knight, Patty Mills, Collision, etc most the PG's in today's game aren't traditional pass first setup an offense players. Its about having 3 point shooting, pick and roll, shot creation from that position all of which CJ was good at.

    The 80's and 90's were very different.
     
    GoBlazersGo likes this.
  20. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,622
    Likes Received:
    20,298
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    Copy...paste
     

Share This Page