Politics Enough with the Hillary cult: Her admirers ignore reality, dream of worshipping a queen

Well, you let me know when 'I watched an interview on TV and I decided he's telling the truth' becomes the evidence standard for judicial decisions.

barfo

 

It already is.

 

Crime of the century! Heads will roll!

I think we all know what's coming next: State Department workers were late coming back from lunch!

barfo

 

HuffPost vast right wing conspiracy nut jobs.

What would Obama's secy of defense know about security?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/romanian-hacker-guccifer-_b_9856196.html

Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates says he believes foreign countries like Russia, China and Iran may have hacked the private email server Hillary Clinton used while secretary of State.

“...I think the odds are pretty high,” he said

Gates said he agreed with former acting CIA Director Mike Morell’s claim that the server had probably been hacked by either Russia, China or Iran.

He added that the fact that classified intelligence has been found on the server was “a concern for me.”

 

Obstruction of justice.

 

No, it's just that the service was slow at the restaurant.

barfo

 

Two judges disagree.

WaPost vast right wing conspiracy nut jobs.

Evidence of government wrong doing and bad faith.

constantly shifting admissions by the government and former government officials

https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...a38de8-f5c6-11e5-8b23-538270a1ca31_story.html

“Where there is evidence of government wrong-doing and bad faith, as here, limited discovery is appropriate, even though it is exceedingly rare in FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] cases,” Lamberth wrote.

...

However, Sullivan and Lamberth criticized what Lamberth called the “constantly shifting admissions by the government and former government officials” about the arrangement. Sullivan said the server arrangement allowed former federal employees to decide what government records to disclose, apparently without ensuring that State records were secured within the department’s own systems.

Calling Clinton’s personal server use “extraordinary,” Lamberth wrote, “An understanding of the facts and circumstances . . . is required before the Court can determine whether the search conducted here reasonably produced all responsive documents.”

 

So, if you post this stuff 10,000 times, does it make indictment 10,000 times more likely?

Do you think anyone but you and I is even bothering to read this?

barfo

 

I think it speaks to two different judges looking at the facts and making it a point to mention the obstruction of justice going on.

 

In other news:



http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/trump-clinton-florida-ohio-pennsylvania-222994

Dead heat: Trump, Clinton tied in 3 swing-state polls
The poll shows close races in Florida, Pennsylvania and Ohio.

 

REPORT: Hillary’s Emails Hacked by Russia – Kremlin Deciding Whether to Release 20,000 Stolen Emails

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...deciding-whether-release-20000-emails-hacked/

 

https://www.rt.com/usa/complete-emails-guccifer-clinton-554/

 

The biggest crime is that Hillary's server uses Comic Sans.

 

Or the WWW site does for quoted text.

 

That's an official russian news site. There are other stories that published at least excerpts of those emails.

Granted, these are not directly from the server, but sent to or received from it.

It seems odd to discuss sensitive foreign policy matters to an insecure email address, with someone without clearance.

She can do no wrong!

 

Of course she can (and has) done wrong.

The question is whether this is really the crime of the century as you are making it out to be.

It does point out, however, how scandal-free the last 8 years have been, that 'she used private email' is the worst thing you and your Republican friends can find.

Official russian news site? It's an official russian propaganda site aimed at the outside world.

"The United Kingdom media regulator, Ofcom, has repeatedly found RT to have breached rules on impartiality, and of broadcasting "materially misleading" content."

Are you a communist, Denny? Why do you hate America?

barfo

 

Either the emails in the RT article are real or are not. There's nothing partial or impartial about the content.

The only thing the last 8 years have been is full of excuses by the cultists.

I ask the question again...

Why does most everyone consider the Clintons liars and crooks, but not most other politicians? The answer is: "because there's a there there."

 

Wait, when did people stop considering other politicians liars and crooks? I must have missed that change.

Yes, either the emails in the RT article are real or they are not. Either Guccifer hacked Clinton or he did not. Either Hillary committed a crime or she did not. Either the earth is flat or it is not.

There is something partial about you describing RT as an "official russian news site".

barfo