We took the Champs to the *distance* LOL no we didn't

It's obviously true that the Blazers didn't take the Warriors to the limit in terms of the series--the Blazers were the only ones who faced an elimination game. But it's pretty obvious that they took the Warriors to the limit in several games, even the two in which Curry played starter minutes (even if he wasn't fully in rhythm to start one of them).

More to the point, though, this Warriors fan created an account to pose as a Blazers fan in order to argue from the Warriors' side without overtly identifying with them. That's silly.

 

Well lets see. The facts are we lost game one and two in the first round. The facts are we won game three. The facts are we were winning in game four when they went down with injuries in the FOURTH QUARTER. So 7 quarters of ball we beat them when they were full staffed and we were not (Meyers).

NOW, the game of which GS WAS full staffed... Game 5. We were winning until the 4th quarter. We lead over 80% of the series.

Go back to your own team's page and talk smack there. Your obviously not a fan, just a troll....

 

ScootiePoppen36.

The Warriors did not lead comfortably for a majority in any game aside from game 1.

 

*cough* mixlito *cough*

 

Your fucking high.

He was talking about how you spelled MEDIOCRE.....not MEDICURE

GS lead comfortably the majority of the games? What are YOU talking about. You might be my first ignore because your trolling is just too blatant...

 

Comparing the injured guy to either Griffin or Paul makes your argument irrelevant, and I hope you know that.

Curry had missed so much time, it is reasonable to think it would take him some time to get his legs under him.

Again, I think I'm just looking at it from a point of view you are unable to because of your blind faith, which is great.

 

lmao at This lame troll..Seriously? You just beat us. But obviously you DO believe we took you to the limit or you wouldn't be here. You would have moved on already and start looking at OKC/SA. But no. You are here trying to talk smack. Something tells me its because your already prepping for us kicking your ass next season. And your already SCURRED!!!! Get out of here with this lame trolling crap. What a complete loser.

 

this made me literally lol

 

First, I didn't compare. I simply stated facts. We were the ones short staffed in the first series up until the 4th quarter of game 4. That is a relevant FACT.

It IS reasonable to think Curry would need some time, but he didn't. He scored 17 in OT. And maybe had one of the most heroic moments in BB. NO he didn't need time and if your stating we led game 5 because he was tired... that's an assumption Not a fact.

 

What thread did anyone actually say "we took the champs the distance"? Were those words even actually uttered? If someone did say it, why didn't you just respond to the poster. It seems a little odd/trollish that you would start a new thread for it.

 

When a troll is this obvious, shouldn't it constitute a ban?

 

Nah, it's more fun to mock the ineptness.

 

What you mean "we," Kemosabe?

 

Again, I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish here? We lost in 5 to a great team. We played them very well, and only time will tell if we played them great or not. Certainly better than Houston did. We lost both games at LA, and who know what would have happened had their two best players gone down injured. I know most fans in here would be an excuse machine if Lillard and McCollum both went down.

 

What kind of sentence was this?

I have a lot more respect for trolls who can form complete sentences. At least show you have been educated.

 

Did you come back just to "keep it real?"

 

lol proof you never watched.

If you're going to troll, at least know what the scores were throughout the game, instead of being a bandwagon GSW fan and only looking at the final score.

I'm sorry ESPN was your education. They failed you and led you astray.

 

Eh, I think if we had lost both, there'd be no excuse. Just pack it up and play next year. There'd be hypotheticals, but I don't think hypothetical and excuses go hand in hand.

I see what you're saying, but realistically, it'd just be like "fuck".