California governor signs stringent new gun control laws

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by SlyPokerDog, Jul 1, 2016.

  1. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    125,557
    Likes Received:
    145,805
    Trophy Points:
    115
    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Gov. Jerry Brown signed six stringent gun-control measures Friday that will require people to turn in high-capacity magazines and mandate background checks for ammunition sales, as California Democrats seek to strengthen gun laws that are already among the strictest in the nation.


    Brown vetoed five other bills, including requirement to register homemade firearms and report lost or stolen weapons to authorities.


    The Democratic governor's action is consistent with his mixed record on gun control. Some of the enacted bills duplicate provisions of a November ballot measure by Democratic Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom. Some of the vetoed measures also appear in Newsom's initiative.

    "My goal in signing these bills is to enhance public safety by tightening our existing laws in a responsible and focused manner, while protecting the rights of law-abiding gun owners," Brown wrote in a one-sentence message to lawmakers.

    http://www.oregonlive.com/today/index.ssf/2016/07/california_governor_signs_stri.html
     
  2. MarAzul

    MarAzul LongShip

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    21,370
    Likes Received:
    7,281
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Life is good!
    Location:
    Near Bandon Oregon
    Another reason to vote for Trump.

    This will go to the court, probably close to the time a new justice is confirmed.

    Infringement, for sure.
     
    blue32 and MARIS61 like this.
  3. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    Considering the Supreme Court didn't throw out Connecticut's new gun control laws, it's unlikely that California's will get nixed. There's nothing unconstitutional about these laws...they're ones that could be adopted federally if Congress agreed on them. States can certainly put them into effect on a state level.

    The second amendment prevents complete bans on guns...it says nothing about things like background checks or what types of guns or magazines must be publicly available.
     
  4. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,092
    Likes Received:
    57,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Background checks on ammo.... so what if you reload your own shit?
     
  5. MarAzul

    MarAzul LongShip

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    21,370
    Likes Received:
    7,281
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Life is good!
    Location:
    Near Bandon Oregon
    Slippery slope isn't it! Do I need a background check to buy an RCBS press? I can reload or make fishing lures with it.
    When you start infringing on rights, there is no end to
     
    blue32 likes this.
  6. MarAzul

    MarAzul LongShip

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    21,370
    Likes Received:
    7,281
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Life is good!
    Location:
    Near Bandon Oregon
    No it does not. The words complete or guns is not mentioned. The words, Right and Infringed are salient though.
     
  7. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    What constitutes "infringement" has always been up to interpretation. The first amendment, for example, can be legally infringed to prevent dangerous actions (the classic example is that you are not allowed to yell "fire" in a crowded theater when there is no fire).

    That's why I said that all it guarantees is no full ban on guns. That would be a negation of the right. Beyond that, what "infringes" is up to the courts.

    (As for the word "guns" not being present, it's generally accepted, as far as I've seen, that the word "arms" refers to guns. Otherwise, it would require that there could be no restrictions on rocket-launchers, nuclear bombs, etc. Even the NRA's leadership doesn't go quite that far.)
     
  8. MarAzul

    MarAzul LongShip

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    21,370
    Likes Received:
    7,281
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Life is good!
    Location:
    Near Bandon Oregon
    Minstrel needs some basic training.

    This is your weapon,
    this is your gun,
    this is for fighting,
    this is for fun.

    Arms are weapons.
     
  9. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Welcome to the People's Republic of California.
     
    MarAzul likes this.
  10. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    125,557
    Likes Received:
    145,805
    Trophy Points:
    115
    I love that part of the Constitution.
     
  11. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    Actually, the first line is "This is my rifle," not "This is my weapon."

    So arms are rifles? How Canadian of you. Sounds like you agree that handguns should be restricted. ;)
     
  12. 3RA1N1AC

    3RA1N1AC 00110110 00111001

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    20,918
    Likes Received:
    5,168
    Trophy Points:
    113
    california has a higher gdp than france, #6 in the entire world actually. pretty interesting to think about.
     
  13. 3RA1N1AC

    3RA1N1AC 00110110 00111001

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    20,918
    Likes Received:
    5,168
    Trophy Points:
    113
    actually they could pass the UK and become 5th any day now if they keep shitting the bed.
     
  14. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Kind of funny how they've driven much of the TV and movie industry out of the state and are working on driving tech out of the state, too.

    Talk about killing the golden goose.
     
  15. blue32

    blue32 Who wants a mustache ride?

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    8,613
    Likes Received:
    2,102
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I fucking hate California, and they're all coming up here too... Blah
     
  16. MarAzul

    MarAzul LongShip

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    21,370
    Likes Received:
    7,281
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Life is good!
    Location:
    Near Bandon Oregon
    You mean the part that doesn't mention gun?
     
  17. MarAzul

    MarAzul LongShip

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    21,370
    Likes Received:
    7,281
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Life is good!
    Location:
    Near Bandon Oregon
    Canadian was not spoken on the Decatur grinder.
     
  18. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    125,557
    Likes Received:
    145,805
    Trophy Points:
    115
    No.

    I like guns. I own guns. And unlike you I respect guns.
     
  19. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    125,557
    Likes Received:
    145,805
    Trophy Points:
    115
    So did anyone read the actual article? It was interesting the parts that the Governor vetoed. It was also interesting how instead of making one giant piece of gun legislation they instead broke it down into individual laws. I'm guessing this was done so if something gets overturned by the courts the rest of the legislation is still enforced.

    So you guys really think these laws are bad?

    The new law will require ammunition sellers to be licensed.

    He also opted to require a background check before a gun can be loaned to someone who isn't a family member.

    No need to answer, Marazul, we already know what you think about this.
     
    Minstrel likes this.
  20. MarAzul

    MarAzul LongShip

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    21,370
    Likes Received:
    7,281
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Life is good!
    Location:
    Near Bandon Oregon
    Do you find humor in this?
     

Share This Page