Or convert public restrooms into several single-use restrooms for any person. Problem solved. However, women will soon realize how nasty a restroom can be after several men use it.
Not denying that one bit, but without science it would be an impossibility, like it was up until 40 or so years ago. If we have a major catastrophe and our foundation crumbles and we are sent back to caveman times without electricity, then we will once again have to rely on intercourse as a sole source for procreation. Again, I am not saying I am against or disagree with anyone else on whether it is right or wrong. I think only the individual can answer that for themselves and society should respect that. Again, it doesn't mean I have to believe it is the right direction for humans as a race, whether it be instinctive for the individual or not. Yeah, my mouse works again!
Humans aren't "evolving" into homosexuals. Homosexuality is a minority trait, one that has always been present (just not always expressed publicly in the past)--in a world that's actually dealing with overpopulation, I think it's hard to argue that a few people who don't reproduce (without the aid of science, at least) is harming the world at all. You really don't have to worry about a human population that can't reproduce itself forward.
The last thing I'm worried about on the planet is the depopulation of the human species....we're like cockroaches.pretty hard to wipe out.Even a guy like Keith Richards can grow old here.
All good, I don't think I explained my point of view clearly. Poor choice of words in some posts. I think we are al closer to agreeing than disagreeing, other than for my opinion on the continuation of the human race, but then maybe that isn't the worst thing for mother earth either, lol. I mean no disrespect to anyone who disagrees with me and do not think any differently of anyone who has different views. Hell I told King if he is in town during the season to hit me up, Id take him to a game and buy him a beer because I love his fandom. I might not see eye to eye with him on everything and one of those things might be our view point on how we continue as a human race if everyone were to evolve into a homosexual life. I don't have a clue and his stance has no relevance of my respect for him as a human being. There are people out there who can believe that Homosexuality is not the best thing in the long run for the evolution of the human race while at the same time believe that everyone should have their individual right to be who they feel they are, regardless of potential pressure from either side. I am one of them. I am in support of gay rights and individual freedoms. I think this supersedes one's opinion on what might be best for the long run. If it didn't then I would want to be some Hitler or something. lol. Hope I've explained myself a bit better.
Hmmm, I would question that without statistical data. There is no doubt that it has always been around and there is a validity to the term "coming out of the closet". But with that said, I think there has been a descent surge from the 60's on.
I'm not going to read past the "without science" part. You do know gay people can physically have sex with the opposite sex right?
I am not a scientist but I remember something about synthetic estrogen being prevalent in our manufacturing. Maybe a reason...
No real responses to this huh? So it's easier to legislate others then it is to take personal responsibility? This entire argument seems to be not about little girls seeing a penis and more about men being afraid that a transgendered person will see theirs.
Look, here is a simple guide to most political discussions. 1. Pick a side. 2. Make sure and pick it based on emotions or what a family member or friend thinks. 3. Defend that choice with anything you can remotely tie to it logically. 4. Answer everything with a one in a million chance "what if" 5. Say you'll agree to disagree and move along.
No, I fully admit, im being extreme. I justg dont beleive the body was intend for such activities or we would also be asexual and be able to reproduce within our own sex. Oh come on now.. Am I to take you seriously on this? Of course I do, but since when have they been able to produce offspring in such a manner?
So I am to assume that now that science can produce babies through in vitro, gay people would still be too dumb to impregnate each other without it?
Uhhh okay? HOw? When? Women can impregnate women? Men can impregnate men? Naturally?????? First, Who said anything about it being of an IQ factor? Taking this personal? Hope not... and without science? Taking the body as is? Without any outside influence or change? SO I can go have sex with a man and impregnate him? With science ANYTHING can be manipulated. We can cross species' genes. Doesn't mean it was meant to be or natural. Gimme a break on this man... Caveman were not able to go next door to buddies cave and have sex with him and create little cave men.....
You keep saying the body, the body, the body. It's not our bodies that got us to the place of the most dominate species on the this planet, it's the mind. We're a creature that does, dreams, desires, and demands different things.
Oh jesussssssss. Yes, a woman can impregnate another woman. 1. Find a guy who is willing. 2. Say "here, bang my girlfriend"
