No, you don't seem to understand. I'm acutely aware. You look at raw numbers and make your conclusion instead of looking at the broader picture.
Your racist undertones are really sickening. You scream Blacks are violent, murderers, who destroy their own community without saying those words.
There is a violent pattern wherever the cops concentrate their energies. If you run a red light and there's no cop, there is no ticket. If you run a red light and there's a cop, you get the ticket. Thus if you have cops focused on black neighborhoods, there's going to be more tickets. It's common sense.
Since you like numbers: In 02' stopped/frisked 97,296 times. 80,176 were totally innocent (82 percent). In 03, stopped/frisked 160,851 times. 140,442 were totally innocent (87 percent). 77,704 were black (54 percent). 44,581 were Latino (31 percent). 17,623 were white (12 percent). 83,499 were aged 14-24 (55 percent). In 04, stopped/frisked 313,523 times. 278,933 were totally innocent (89 percent). 155,033 were black (55 percent). 89,937 were Latino (32 percent). 28,913 were white (10 percent). 152,196 were aged 14-24 (52 percent). In 05, stopped/frisked 398,191 times. 352,348 were totally innocent (89 percent). 196,570 were black (54 percent). 115,088 were Latino (32 percent). 40,713 were white (11 percent). 189,854 were aged 14-24 (51 percent). In 06, stopped/frisked 506,491 times. 457,163 were totally innocent (90 percent). 267,468 were black (53 percent). 147,862 were Latino (29 percent). 53,500 were white (11 percent). 247,691 were aged 14-24 (50 percent). In 07, stopped/frisked 472,096 times. 410,936 were totally innocent (87 percent). 243,766 were black (54 percent). 141,868 were Latino (31 percent). 52,887 were white (12 percent). 223,783 were aged 14-24 (48 percent). In 08, stopped/frisked 540,302 times. 474,387 were totally innocent (88 percent). 275,588 were black (53 percent). 168,475 were Latino (32 percent). 57,650 were white (11 percent). 263,408 were aged 14-24 (49 percent). In 09, stopped/frisked 581,168 times. 510,742 were totally innocent (88 percent). 310,611 were black (55 percent). 180,055 were Latino (32 percent). 53,601 were white (10 percent). 289,602 were aged 14-24 (50 percent). In 10, stopped/frisked 601,285 times. 518,849 were totally innocent (86 percent). 315,083 were black (54 percent). 189,326 were Latino (33 percent). 54,810 were white (9 percent). 295,902 were aged 14-24 (49 percent). In 11, stopped/frisked 685,724 times. 605,328 were totally innocent (88 percent). 350,743 were black (53 percent). 223,740 were Latino (34 percent). 61,805 were white (9 percent). 341,581 were aged 14-24 (51 percent). In 12, stopped/frisked 532,911 times 473,644 were totally innocent (89 percent). 284,229 were black (55 percent). 165,140 were Latino (32 percent). 50,366 were white (10 percent). In 13, stopped/frisked 191,558 times. 169,252 were totally innocent (88 percent). 104,958 were black (56 percent). 55,191 were Latino (29 percent). 20,877 were white (11 percent). In 14, stopped/frisked 45,787 times. 37,744 were totally innocent (82 percent). 24,319 were black (53 percent). 12,489 were Latino (27 percent). 5,467 were white (12 percent). In 15, stopped/frisked 22,939 times. 18,353 were totally innocent (80 percent). 12,223 were black (54 percent). 6,598 were Latino (29 percent). 2,567 were white (11 percent).
I don't scream any of that. That is you on your own volition portraying that onto anyone who doesn't agree with you. I am simply showing numbers. Black on black crime, black on black murders. While calling you out on your linked article about white people killing cops, using numbers to refute your agenda.
Tickets is a rhetorical example for any kind of crime. If you carry drugs in a neighborhood not policed heavily, you won't get caught so much. If you carry drugs in a heavily policed neighborhood, your chances of getting busted go up substantially. If the cops have a preconceived notion that people in X neighborhood are likely to carry drugs, they go out of their way to stop and hassle people looking for those drugs. In other words, they'll stop a black person in a black neighborhood for a busted tail light far more frequently than in other neighborhoods. In this example, drugs is the example.
So again, how do you explain the disproportionately high amount of black on black crime, specifically murders? Were talking violent crimes here Denny.
Completely disregarding the numbers that police contact is disproportionately high. Stop and Frisk data proves this. Code.
Its called patterns. Police use them. When a certain area has a pattern for violent crimes such as murders for example, police put a heavier presence in that area. You call it profiling. The rest of the world sees it as proactive policing.
God.... so what are the patterns with stop and Frisk? 88% of the black people they stop and Frisk are completely innocent. They're stopped because they "look suspicious". Sounds like a waste of the PD's time and money.
Again, you are changing the subject yet again from murder/violent crime to "stop and frisk" and an off hand comment about drug use. What does this have to do with your article you linked that I replied to and created this sub discussion?
The schools suck in black neighborhoods because the money is diverted elsewhere. Enterprise in black neighborhoods is suppressed by government regulations and trade association rules. Cops arrest black men (especially) for the most trivial of crimes. Black unemployment is significantly higher than it rightfully should be (why is that? You won't admit or like the answer). And you wonder why there's a sense of hopeless among the people.
