Geez! Throwing around unsubstantiated charges like this is slime bucket territory. How does that feel? Probably need shower I suppose.
How would you know? The FBI has a strict policy against discussing ongoing investigations. They'd never reveal something like that. Unless of course it involves Clinton. barfo
A civil suite is all you got? Really? Is that what you're using to counter the countless years and depth of corruption the Clinton's have gotten themselves into within the Government? I mean, the two top AG's, an FBI director and one of the leading media outlets? It's all there for them. Break the law, get it covered up, AND never covered by media. Then when a media outlet does find it, blame it on the Russians! LOL. Hillary supporters are blind. Jesus!
Get back to us when there is something tangible to discuss. A civil suite in business.... gee..... really?
He was in the business of raping 13 year olds? Again, your standards of proof are biased. You can go with 'where there's smoke there's fire', in which case both candidates are guilty as hell, or 'innocent until proven guilty', in which case both candidates are innocent, at least for the time being. But you can't take the former stance for Clinton, and the latter stance for Trump. Well, you can if you want - but it isn't fooling anyone. barfo
Again, what proof do you have of him raping a 13 year old? Leaked emails, evidence destroying actions, anything? Clinton IS guilty, FBI even said so. She just got off of charges because she has friends in the Justice department, and FBI.
Same proof you have of Clinton's guilt: "It's what I want to believe, so it must be true". No, the FBI did not say so. Plus, the FBI is not in charge of deciding innocence or guilt. It's the FBI, not the FBJ (or the PBJ). barfo
It's semantics. It's not what I want to believe. She was/is guilty, they worded it in a way to get her a way out because she had/has connections. Simple as that.
It doesn't matter what the justice system determines or what the facts are, she's guilty because you, blue32, have decided she's guilty. Simple as that. So here's my proof about Trump's guilt: he's guilty because I've decided he's guilty. Simple as that. barfo
The same way we knew about there being no intent on the criminal's part, before Comey's first press conference. http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/01/politics/donald-trump-russia-fbi-investigations/index.html Ha ha.
I'm not a Hillary supporter, I just recognize that both of these candidates are morally and ethically unacceptable.
But which one will move this country to where it needs to go. That is the question. One is steeped in Government corruption and one is a dick head.
OK. I will play. http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/01/politics/donald-trump-russia-fbi-investigations/ "But none so far have yielded proof of criminal connections between the parties" --- When CNN is posting that we know he's clean, because I am sure they were having a panic attack writing those words... Now when we move onto Clinton we have a whole treasure trove of goodies to pick out.
What does the phrase 'so far' mean to you? It applies equally to the Clinton and Trump investigations. barfo
Honestly neither. The one thing I worry about with Trump is that he says things that sound like they're out of the 1930s fascist playbook. I say this not as a partisan, but a student of history, he wouldn't reform our system he could very well detonate it. If Hillary gets elected I actually think there's a good chance she gets impeached and removed. That's my long game, best case.
My best case is one of them gets elected and proves to be a surprisingly good president, and we all live happily ever after. barfo
I could see both candidates facing impeachment if elected....so we're more than likely looking at Pence or Kaine
