Actually, there appears to be a tissue shortage due to all the crying over the past 8 years from the right over Obama getting elected....and re-elected.....
Whatever... For the record, I considered Obama my president even though I preferred Gary Johnson. I opposed much of his policy but also applauded some of it, particularly when it came to not spending money and furthering individual liberty. It really goes to show how awful a candidate Romney was, unable to beat an incumbent president with a record that was easy to run against.
Why will Hillary be stained for losing to another (he beat her because he's more liberal) Democrat? She cost Democrats 4, not 12, years of the presidency. Add that to the 1990s, and the Clinton name won a net of 4 years...it didn't lose 12-16 years as you say. Many presidential candidates have lost twice. Big deal. As for incompetence, she's plenty competent. Just too conservative for Democrats' taste.
Not really. Trump's 2016 total, so far, is over 700,000 votes less than what McCain drew in 2008 — and more than 1.7 million less than what Romney drew four years ago. Trump just had the advantage of running against an opponent that even her own party didn't like very much.
Trump's own party liked him less. If he had the party's full support, I thnk he would have had millions more votes.
If only the Democrats had offered up an alternative to Hillary Clinton! Somebody male and white (obvs - gotta please the "Trump Democrats") Somebody younger to excite the younger generation Somebody nice and moderate, and free from scandal Somebody like this: I'm sure the Democratic voters would've been ALL OVER him in the Primaries.
Okay mook (and co.) - who's your dream Democratic candidate for 2020? Michelle Obama? After all, we have to make sure we "excite" you enough to vote against 4 more years of Trump.
Michelle Obama is a clown like Biden. She isn't mentally centered/disciplined like Hillary. https://sputniknews.com/us/201611101047315701-sanders-potential-2020-run/ Yes.
I do agree it should be a man cuz duh... However it should have been someone who is tough on the middle east and more of a war hawk. Preferably someone who takes a tough stance on false sexual assault claims, we don't need tramps ruining people's careers for nothing. Someone the DNC wants to win so we can all look the other way when they screw an old socialist out of the nomination. You, know the more I think about it making it have to be a man is sexist. So nevermind, they already nominated this person.
Ooh, Zach. Might've had the moral high ground for about a second there, then suddenly it was all about Zach. Also? I'm guessing the fact that he zeroed in on climate change as the #1 threat in Zach-ville shows that he's white and he's not going to be jumped at the gas station in the wee small hours in the service of Making America Great Again. So: white man lecturing black woman. Good look, idealistic young Democrat.
