He's a blowhard and a douchebag. No argument there, even from me. But there's a HUGE difference from being a jackass on Twitter, and dropping a nuke on someone because they coughed in your direction. He gave that guestimate during a debate, without any solid intel in front of him. I think, once he has solid intel in front of him from briefings and talks with his Chiefs Of Staff, he'll find another way. A more solid solution would be to completely isolate the region and let ISIS starve, run out of ammunition, and die of thirst. That can be accomplished for far less loss of human life than a conventional ground war. Not to mention tax payer money.
Hmm. I don't. But we'll see. Sure, let's starve a few million civilians to death. That won't make anyone angry. barfo
As opposed to what? Dropping bombs and risking civilian casualties from flying bullets? There is no way not to get our hands dirty in this. Period. The only question becomes: how do I get my hands dusty, as opposed to covered in mud and filth?
I like that. And Dviss, Chris Craig, and Jklpork or whatever his name is. We'll give them some ham to take with them as a peace offering. Should go spiffy.
Kinda wish you'd consolidate all these into one thread rather than starting a new one every time you think of something to say.
I read BBC daily, mostly for amusement as they don't approach news in a very serious manner. And this is exactly the kind of language they used in deriding Bush for 8 years. BBC = CNN for Brits
Yeah, damn, I'd hate to have a really good economy. That would just be awful But, I will definitely wait to see it ... don't yet see anything Trump is proposing that hasn't been tried before. You've got about 8 weeks left to run your mouth before you have to start owning the problems - enjoy it while you can. barfo
