Iraq has a population of 33+ million. Isis had 31,000 militants in Iraq. So for every 1 Isis dumb fuck there were 10,000 Iraqis. And they need us to get rid of Isis? Really? Iraq won't put any skin in the game but we're suppose to? Fuck that! Fuck keeping our troops in Iraq for as long as we did. Fuck sending them back there. AND FUCK IRAQ!
Do you even try to make sense any more? I've known literal schizophrenics who were more coherent than you.
It's funny - when I was a vaguely left-wing kid at a school full of rich kids in Thatcher's Britain I got told to "fuck off to Russia" (for, among other things, criticizing the Falklands War). Now, apparently Republicans should REALLY fuck off to Russia. Actually, Denny would fit right in. I don't think they call it Pravda any more but he's certainly got the skills.
I'm not sure if I've ever tried to make sense. But you need to stop with the personal insults. Thanks.
She is THE most evil warmonger in this administration, and now she does a high school play impersonation copied from McCarthyism.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/14/craig-murray-says-source-of-hillary-clinton-campai/ WikiLeaks figure says ‘disgusted’ Democrat leaked Clinton campaign emails A WikiLeaks figure is claiming that he received leaked Clinton campaign emails from a “disgusted” Democratic whistleblower, while the White House continued to blame Russian hackers Wednesday for meddling in the presidential election and asserted that Donald Trump was “obviously aware” of Moscow’s efforts on his behalf. Craig Murray, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, said in the report by the Daily Mail that he flew to Washington for a clandestine handoff with one of the email sources in September. He said he received a package in a wooded area near American University. “Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,” Mr. Murray told the British newspaper. “The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.”
Well, that's certainly an important find. I guess we really do need to scrap the CIA, as they clearly are completely incompetent. Another important scoop from the Washington Times, an internationally respected journalistic titan.
Suuuuuure. The CIA is infallible. http://nation.time.com/2012/09/06/iraq-how-the-cia-says-it-blew-it-on-saddams-wmd/ Iraq: How the CIA Says It Blew It on Saddam’s WMD Now that we’re out of Iraq, the CIA has come clean on how it came to be bamboozled about Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) ferrets over at the National Security Archive (NSA) petitioned for, and got, the CIA’s equivalent of the dog-ate-my-homework. (Technically, the NSA obtained this document under a mandatory-declassification-review request it made in 2006, which can be faster [It still took six years!] than an FOIA request if the requester has sufficient details on a specific document.) Bottom line, from the CIA’s point of view: Saddam used to lie about possessing WMD, so we believed he still was. Unfortunately, the U.S. went to war based largely on that false intelligence. And 4,486 U.S. troops, 318 allies and untold thousands of Iraqis died in the ensuing conflict.
We went to war with Iraq because the Bush administration wanted to go to war with Iraq. Not because the CIA wanted to go to war with Iraq.
I knew that. Every time anyone asked pointed questions back then, that was the only excuse given. As one who still backs the original invasion, you should know that. Also, the false intelligence came from Israeli intelligence.
