You just admitted that you have no problem with laws that would put you into jail for not hurting anyone. Okay, as long as we got that straight. When will you report? Of course, it's legal for heterosexuals to ask ("solicit" as you call it) each other for sex. But you want it illegal for yourself.
I don't AGREE with a lot of the laws that are out there. I don't believe that owning a Suppressor is hurting anyone, nor that I should have to seek the Federal Government's permission for it. Same with Short Barreled Rifles. I don't agree with 20 MPH speed limits in school zones either. But whether or not I agree with these things does not change the fact that they are ILLEGAL. I wouldn't speed in a school zone for risk of a massive fine. And I wouldn't solicit sex in a public restroom for the same reason I wouldn't illegally purchase or make my own Suppressor, or modify my AK-47 to a barrel length of less than 16". Jesus Christ. It has nothing to do with whether or not I FEEL they're right or wrong: THEY ARE ILLEGAL. Don't commit ILLEGAL ACTS. NO it fucking isn't. I mean Jesus....do you also deny that the sky is blue? That grass is green? Do you deny that paper is white too? That is the logic of your argument. Go on to Craigslist and see people blatantly using code words to solicit sex from other people. They use code words because IT'S ILLEGAL. Fucking seriously! Common sense man!
Guns will never be illegal. Your scenario has as much relevance as, "If you were Superman would you have sex with Lois Lane?"
You keep acting as if my examples were all about soliciting in public restrooms. To repeat the 3 from that article (you dismissed the first by saying you don't believe it):
They were busted for SOLICITING SEX. Fuck, even I can figure that out! Two guys just happen to be arrested, out of ALL the gay people in the state? Come on now! It had nothing to do with whether or not they were gay. Go study the cases in detail, and use an UNBIASED source besides Slate. Nevermind the fact that one of those cases was a DOMESTIC VIOLENCE arrest!
You keep saying that, but the incident you're thinking of was in a different state from the incident I'm listing. I excluded yours from my list. You don't want to break the law. So if you ever live in places where it's illegal to ask for sex, you'll be happy to live in chastity for the rest of your life. You are truly an upstanding martyr. The crappy legal system should give you a medal. You will be rewarded in Heaven. Well, maybe not there, but you will hold a high rank after you die for your Earthly sacrifice.
Your jokes have been pretty sad lately. You used to be more funny. Guess jerking off to Bernie posters and Castro dying dried up your sense of humor.
Correct! Now you're getting it! I wouldn't know. I don't make it a habit of soliciting sex from strangers in random or public places. But if that's your thing, then have fun. More power to you.
Again, my 3 examples. You'll get it someday. You keep saying that they involve soliciting, and now you say they all involve strangers. Have you looked up each incident? Because they didn't.
So hold on a minute..... You think these guys were just having sex somewhere in private.....and the police used magical powers to seek them out and arrest them for being gay? Am I understanding this correctly? Please tell me you're smarter than that.
Wrong, but don't let that deter you. We live in a post-fact world now. Lawrence vs. Texas on Wikipedia: On September 17, 1998, John Lawrence,[10][11] a gay 55-year-old medical technologist, was hosting two gay acquaintances, Tyron Garner,[12] age 31, and Robert Eubanks,[13] 40, at his apartment on the outskirts of Houston. Lawrence and Eubanks had been friends for more than 20 years. Garner and Eubanks had a tempestuous on-again off-again romantic relationship since 1990. Lacking transportation home, the couple were preparing to spend the night. Eubanks, who had been drinking heavily, left to purchase a soda from a nearby vending machine. Apparently outraged that Lawrence had been flirting with Garner, he called police and reported "a black male going crazy with a gun" at Lawrence's apartment.[14] Four Harris County sheriff's deputies responded within minutes and Eubanks pointed them to the apartment. They entered the unlocked apartment toward 11 p.m. with their weapons drawn. In accordance with police procedures, the first to arrive, Joseph Quinn, took the lead both in approaching the scene and later in determining what charges to bring. He later reported seeing Lawrence and Garner having anal sex in the bedroom. A second officer reported seeing them engaged in oral sex, and two others did not report seeing the pair having sex. Lawrence repeatedly challenged the police for entering his home. Quinn had discretionary authority to charge them for a variety of offenses and to determine whether to arrest them. When Quinn considered charging them with having sex in violation of state law, he had to get an Assistant District Attorney to check the statutes to be certain they covered sexual activity inside a residence. He was told that Texas's anti-sodomy statute, the "Homosexual Conduct" law, made it a Class C misdemeanor if someone "engages in deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the same sex".[15] The statute, Chapter 21, Sec. 21.06 of the Texas Penal Code, had been adopted in 1973 when the state revised its criminal code to end its proscription on heterosexual anal and oral intercourse.[16] Quinn decided to arrest Lawrence and Garner and charge them with having "deviate sex". In the separate arrest reports he filed for each, he wrote that he had seen the arrestee "engaged in deviate sexual conduct namely, anal sex, with another man".[17] Lawrence and Garner were held in jail overnight. At a hearing the next day, they pleaded not guilty to a charge of "homosexual conduct". They were released toward midnight.[18] Eubanks pleaded no contest to charges of filing a false police report. He was sentenced to 30 days in jail but released early.[19]
I've repeated the 3 incidents over and over. You finally got it. Congratulations! I don't how you thought otherwise, but now you see the sin of your law and order ways. The legal system hates sex and drugs (and men). It is the enemy of anyone who wants to expand our freedoms (except for the freedoms of rich people). It is at war with popular culture, and it has the guns. And the shits stole 1/3 of my family's inheritance, so I live a much different retirement than I had planned.
So... are you saying you believe that nobody innocent gets incarcerated? Or are you denying the specific number? That was just one link. You've boasted about your researching skills in the past, I'm sure you can track down better. Or are you happier being ignorant? ("Nobody professor"! Yeah, what do PROFESSORS know! Bunch of libtards. I'll wait till I hear it verified on TALK RADIO!!!!!)
