See its crap like this that makes me not care what ANYONE says anymore because EVERYONE talks without investigation to confirm their statements. How can this person tell she is taking a picture vs reading or responding to a text or simply reading a headline? I could not tell the difference and further more it didn't look like she moved her hand around to try to center anything into a picture. This is the type of crap that if I were an Angry person I would be fighting tooth and nail against, but im not an angry person, just a disappointed person. So I just ignore it all and when the sky falls the sky falls. I wont get accurate info when it does because too many people do this kind of stuff. Csan't trust anything you read online so why spend so much of one's time worrying about it and spend all day re posting and arguing about it? None of us knows whats accurate and whats not.....
I guess we'll find out sooner or later if she did or did not. Looks pretty evident to me what she's doing. She even scans the room with her eyes first.
I didnt see her scan the roiom. I saw her look to one side for a moment, but the room is emptying. lots of activity and lots of things that can catch the eye. Furthermore, d oyou see the angle of the camera vs the doc on the table? You really think someone is goign to be ableto read the doc from a picture taken at that angle? Here is a pic I just took attempting to get the same angle on a manual. Can you read it? That was probably closer to this than she was to hers and when I grab the pic on my phone to expand as large as possible, I can still only read the headline. I am just saying if she was taking pics of the doc for actual info, she would more than likely need a much better picture than the one she was taking IF she was taking one.
Your attachment was made low res by the software. If she has a modern phone, the image would be 4K and zooming in on the text would absolutely make it readable.
I had a used door that I checked over and it looked perfect. The paint shop said it had a scratch in it. I had a picture of when I fit the door. Not believing that they didn't scratch it I went back and zoomed in and sure as shit, scratch. I can't even upload it because it is too big.
I had to text it to myself to reduce the size, scratch is about two inches in front and six inches below silver door handle
when you uploaded it to S2, the site software reduced your image resolution so it doesn't take people forever to download the image. Plus, a 4K image would be the full size of your screen if you have a 4K display. And as with 4K, incredibly detailed.
I stil dont see it. Or barely see it. definitely not clear. Kinda validating my point that the doc would be pretty hard to read at the angle she would have taken the pic from regardless of zoomability, no?
But I am referring to looking at it on my [-hone prior to uploading to S2. I zoom in all the way and still cant read the doc. It is full size on my screen when I tilt the phone on its side.
On my phone it is as plain as day. The original is wayyyyy too big of a file to upload. I texted it to myself and saved it. My phone decreased the size of the file to make it textable.
Just took this picture of a bunch of coolant from 4 or 5 feet away, no zoom. On my phone I can read the text. Again, this is after texting it to myself
NV-OSHA must be far more relaxed than OR_OSHA. Up here they'd be running around with their hair on fire and levying fines for no chemical containment. And yes, I know it's only antifreeze......
Not a fine here. We have containment for everything required by law, grounded cabinets for the paint shop and recycling containers kept in a leak proof container for oil and antifreeze.
