Guns Make People Safe

No, that was Cheney after that unfortunate hunting accident.

 

I bought a dick cheney mask after that and went clay shooting while i wore it. I got some serious laughs.

 

Hey, just a heads up....on page 10 of this thread, a website tried attacking my computer with a jpg image. I'm not sure how that is, since there was no image on the page. It happened about 3 times.

It came from peopleshouse.org. I tried looking that up on Google, and it gave me the same thing.

My Avast security blocked the threat.

If the Mods could look into this, I'd appreciate it, thanks.

 

Looks like I'm gonna have to run a scan on my computer later. Thanks.

Tell blue I love him, but it's not appreciated. Although I'm sure it wasn't intentional.

 

Thanks Obama

 

You got that right!

So it is ok for the State to force those not nearly so well off to makes sure Teachers are treated like no one else in society?

"If a teacher can't recoup the cost of their education that career will stop attracting people to it."

You make this sound like a sacred pack! Why should the State protect teachers (alone) instead of their customers?

 

Do you actually believe the shit you say?

 

I'm not wrong.

 

standing up or sitting down?

 

Guns help keep you safe from grizzly bears. It is known.

 

Ruger didn't make this bad boy for nothing...



I've shot it. Numerous times. It is.....quite a pistol.

 

Not good enough. See Revenant.

 

Any modern big-bore firearm, with modern ammunition, is 10-times better than a musket of that era. The ballistics are just simply better. Better bullets, better bullet construction, better powders, higher velocities, and more accurate barrels.

Especially in the case of this pistol, chambered in .454 Casull, which uses a small rifle primer and has a SAAMI spec of 65,000 PSI. Which is freaking enormous for a handgun cartridge.

 

Dramatic much? It's not a sacred pack (whatever a sacred pack is... maybe a Bible in a suitcase?), it's just simple math/economics. The state isn't protecting them, they're setting educational requirements that are costly to obtain. The state can make the choice to lower that qualification and pay less but the current higher requirements tilt the supply and demand in the teacher's favor.

 

Why the hell is the State saying anything about what a local school pays? The State isn't involved with any other occupation?

 

State workers might have something to say about that.....and regardless of what some people's opinions about public employees are, they are in occupations.......

 

Obtuse.