I think planned parenthood is an issue to some. Just as clean water is an issue to some. Or solidarity, or equal pay (which they already have). And so on.
So... Trump's "support" is butthurt people voting against Clinton? Someone should tell him that's not really a "movement". (Maybe a bowel movement.) I've seen this rationale before: "keep saying that and we'll keep voting Trump". How 'bout you vote for somebody for positive reasons, not because somebody hurt your tiny fragile feelings?
Nick Offerman: Ron Swanson would NOT be a Trump fan: https://www.buzzfeed.com/keelyflahe...t-donald-trump?utm_term=.hsvWNVg0e#.gwKowRN91
You don't think telling elitists, Hollywood, and Hillary Clinton to fuck off is a "positive reason"? Really? I do. And I think you know perfectly well that there were many other reasons that people voted for Trump that didn't have to do with "name calling". Like the fact that he's not a career politician; which is the reason I voted for him. Everything else was just a bonus.
Oh yeah conservatives never whine! They always accept their losses with absolute grace and humility. Gimme a fucking break lol
Oh man I kill myself. And RON SWANSON WOULDN'T HAVE VOTED FOR HILLARY EITHER BITCH. He'd prefer Trump and Hillary died in a fire together.
Yeah the kenneth starr report was a $40 - $70 million dollar "whine" by conservatives. Who knows what that would equate to in today's money. Conservatives have spent millions of dollars over the years trying to nail the Clinton's and your guy promised to finally prosecute. Now he's asking you to give them a standing ovation on election day. #DrainingTheSwamp
It wasn't whining, it was legal proof the man lied under oath and denied a woman her fair hearing in the courts. It's unfortunate the republicans chose to impeach him over that violation of his duties and oath instead of several other ones.
Stevenson, not sure what specifically you are referring to, but consider. Trump and his spokespeople lied about easily verifiable facts; crowd size, what he said about the intelligence community, even the weather. But there are times when we won't have the means to easily or quickly verify if what the administration is saying is true, or totally made up, or what. If they say, for example, Iran is violating the terms of the nuclear deal, or someone threatened a US warship, would we know the facts? Could we accept their word? I was actually at the women's march (in Oakland). Yeah, CNN, major fail. They had a panel to discuss the women's marches. Eight men. One little lady who actually got to talk once.