Politics Abraham Lincoln: worst president ever?

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by Sinobas, Aug 26, 2017.

  1. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    Uh huh. I was responding to Sinobas' post that the Union should have just blockaded the South til they gave up slavery, which the South had already proven they were willing to go to war to preserve. My post had nothing to do with Lincoln's motivations.
     
    dviss1 likes this.
  2. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    A woman has a legal right to leave a marriage. A section of the United States doesn't have the legal right to unilaterally choose to become a separate nation. So, while your counter-example is certainly eye-catching, it's not actually valid.
     
    dviss1 likes this.
  3. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,976
    Likes Received:
    10,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    There's nothing in the constitution that forbids secession. In fact, the Declaration of Independence said that when government becomes oppressive, you rebel against it or leave it.

    Many believe Lincoln altered the very nature of this nation by making the Federal bit more important than the States bit.

    Your blockade idea is unworkable. The South would have made export deals with the British and French and your navy would be attacking those nations' ships.
     
  4. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    The Supreme Court has consistently held that the Constitution created an "indestructible union." So there currently is no merit to the idea that secession is a legal option.

    That was Sinobas' idea. I agree that it was unworkable.
     
  5. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,976
    Likes Received:
    10,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Lincoln also floundered around worse than Bush in Iraq or even this Trump administration. He fired people left and right until he found a general who could win.

    Gettysburgh was fought on NORTHERN soil. The North was losing the war for a good part of it.
     
  6. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Once they were invaded, it became a matter of honor to defend their homeland. Many Confederate soldiers said how they were fighting to defend their state, most of them did not own slaves.

    It's a non-sequitur to assume that because they defended their home states from invasion, that they would not have eventually made consessions as the result of a blockade.
     
  7. MarAzul

    MarAzul LongShip

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    21,370
    Likes Received:
    7,281
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Life is good!
    Location:
    Near Bandon Oregon
    Correct. Forcing the south to pay hire tariffs and spending the money to benefit the North.
     
  8. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    They were a rebellion, not a sovereign nation. So there was no invasion, simply a rebellion being put down.
     
  9. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,976
    Likes Received:
    10,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    There is nothing in the constitution forbidding secession. There are secession movements in several states, including Hawaii and California. The US will not start bombing those places if they leave. That would be silly.

    The Hawaiians would learn that leaving the empire would worsen their poverty. California would learn that they'll have to pollute since they won't have Texas doing it for them.
     
    bodyman5000 and 1 likes this.
  10. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There was nothing in the constitution that forbid it. And even if you're living in a culture where a woman has no legal right to divorce, that still doesn't mean the husband has "no option" but to kill her.
     
    bodyman5000 and 1 likes this.
  11. MarAzul

    MarAzul LongShip

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    21,370
    Likes Received:
    7,281
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Life is good!
    Location:
    Near Bandon Oregon
    Yes a blockade is an act of war. Lincoln committed two acts of war after the south seceded.
    The first was sending Federal troops to occupy the old abandon fort in Charleston bay, fort Sumter which at that time was territory of South Carolina and the Confederacy.
    And he did order the blockade of the south..
    These two acts of war goaded them into firing on Fort Sumter, as it was part of the blockade of Charleston.
     
  12. MarAzul

    MarAzul LongShip

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    21,370
    Likes Received:
    7,281
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Life is good!
    Location:
    Near Bandon Oregon
    Ha!
    It just has to be that there is some lesson to learn when that one goes down.
     
    bodyman5000 and 1 likes this.
  13. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    For most of our history, people felt paramount loyalty to their state/colony, then to the nation. We were referred to as "These United States" before the war. It would be like if the other EU nations invaded England to preserve the European Union. Oh, but they have "no choice" right?
     
  14. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,976
    Likes Received:
    10,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    There was a lot of pressure on Lincoln to make peace with the South and just let them go. No matter what the Supreme Court might say about it, those states would not be part of the United States.

    If the South won, it wouldn't matter, either.

    So it really doesn't matter what the Court rules on this one.
     
    bodyman5000 and 1 likes this.
  15. MarAzul

    MarAzul LongShip

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    21,370
    Likes Received:
    7,281
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Life is good!
    Location:
    Near Bandon Oregon
    Who will favor Trump going to war to force California to remain in the Union?

    A loud Nay here.
     
    bodyman5000 and 1 and Sinobas like this.
  16. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,976
    Likes Received:
    10,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

    (No matter what the Queen of England, the High Court of England, or the US Supreme Court says otherwise).
     
    bodyman5000 and 1 and MarAzul like this.
  17. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    67,845
    Likes Received:
    66,600
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You don't know the local Hawaiians by this post.....it would affect the mainland haoles who are profiting and occupying their best land....the local Japanese-Hawaiians are pretty savvy business folks....the Japanese tourist industry alone would not dry up ...it fact in would probably increase...A lot of locals live in pretty much poverty as it is. Mainlanders will continue to vacation there no matter who's running the joint. Locals know how to live without a lot of shopping...food grows itself, fish, wild boar, cattle.....Hawaii is not a desert....it's not turning into a ghost town
     
    lawai'a likes this.
  18. H.C.

    H.C. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2013
    Messages:
    8,445
    Likes Received:
    8,728
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yet another issue people must prove x is right.
    When it's factual both Lincoln and the south were to blame for the civil war.

    To act like one is innocent while the other is free of guilt is just utter blindness.
     
    BonesJones likes this.
  19. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Minstrel would have to say yes to that. It just underscores how ridiculous his argument is.
     
  20. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,976
    Likes Received:
    10,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    You don't know the Hawaiians. The typical Hawaiian makes half what people do on the mainland, while the rich mainland haoles buy up their land.

    Tourism is nowhere near enough to save Hawaii from losing their (yes) Interstate Highway funds - losing those alone would see the roads throughout the state go into disrepair.

    I lived there for several years and absolutely know the people and this issue. Their nation was stolen from them by the US, their government deposed, and they were voted into the US by non Hawaiians.

    Some of them believe they can rent out Pearl Harbor to the US after seceding and that would pay for a lot. I don't think the US would keep the base there. There are plenty of other places they can operate from.
     

Share This Page