You don't actually read your sources, do you? David Farenthold has a history of literally shaming Trump into following through by asking repeated questions until he actually does what he's said he'll do.
WaPost wrote he GAVE the money. Before they threw dirt at him and it. http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...kes-good-on-pledge-to-donate-to-harvey-relief Trump makes good on pledge to donate to Harvey relief The Hill confirmed with multiple groups that they received the funds this week.
Good to know it's getting harder for him to duck his commitments. Shame that if he's as rich as he says, this is about equivalent to you or me giving about ten bucks.
http://deadline.com/2017/09/redskin...r-trek-discovery-donald-trump-nbc-1202176141/ ‘Sunday Night Football’ Ratings Down Again On Day Of Player Protests In metered market numbers, the primetime matchup that saw the Washington Redskins beat the Oakland Raiders 27-10 snared an 11.6/20, the worst SNF has performed this season so far. It’s an 8% dip from the early numbers of last week’s game, Atlanta’s 34-23 win over Green Bay. Amid cheers and boos from fans at FedEx Field in Maryland last night, the third week of the SNF season declined 10% from early numbers of the comparable game of last year on September 25, 2016.
WaPost said he gave the money. Then went on to smear him. What else is new? The citation was accurate.
That their history has zero to do with posting video of their burning their NFL branded items in protest. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_fallacy It has the general argument form: If P, then Q. P is a fallacious argument. Therefore, Q is false.[6] Thus, it is a special case of denying the antecedent where the antecedent, rather than being a proposition that is false, is an entire argument that is fallacious. A fallacious argument, just as with a false antecedent, can still have a consequent that happens to be true. The fallacy is in concluding the consequent of a fallacious argument has to be false.
Next lesson: the "use/mention" distinction. We'll bring you up to speed eventually Denny! Hang in there!
I stated a fact. that Pittsburgh fans have reacted violently in the past. no logic flaw in the statements unless you can't believe the video evidence to the contrary.
If the Sunday Night game ratings were down I could argue that it was a sign of protest against the Washington REDSKINS, not against players taking a knee.
This is the absolute perfect example of the old saying, "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit." Sure beats being wrong, eh?
"President Trump gave $1 million of his own money to charities" The key bit. Not "President Trump allegedly gave $1 million of his own money to charities" as you were fooled into thinking. You know what they say, fool you once... fool Rasta twice.
Nothing beats being right. There's no bullshit about it. It makes no difference what Pittsburg fans ever did in the past. It has nothing, absolutely nothing, to do with them burning their NFL gear and posting video to social media saying exactly why (protest). I get that you don't like me being right. When I'm actually wrong, I'll admit it.
