More bad news. Obstruction of justice? It's something someone's smoking, not reality. http://thehill.com/policy/national-...ident-can-fire-an-fbi-director-for-any-reason Comey farewell: ‘A president can fire an FBI director for any reason’ Former FBI Director James Comey on Wednesday sent a letter to agents and friends following President Trump firing him the previous day. “I have long believed that a President can fire an FBI director for any reason, or for no reason at all,”he wrote, according to CNN. "I’m not going to spend time on the decision or the way it was executed."
Wait, so if a foreign government is committing crimes in the United States we shouldn't do anything about it because that will let them know that we know they are committing crimes? Sense.Perfect.Makes.
True. He could be secretly taking countermeasures, while publicly praising Russia, refusing to implement sanctions, and not asking any of his department heads to take any action. Fiendishly clever, that Trump! They'll never see it coming. barfo
So the AG shouldn't oversee the investigation of crimes if those crimes are committed by a foreign government inside of the United States? Again.Sense.Perfect.Makes.
Again, you have no way to know. Whining in public about some devious Russians sure isn't all that satisfying. Probably ineffective too.
After today's indictment if you want to say that there is no proof that Trump benefited from Russian meddling, I would agree with that. But saying that Russian meddling isn't a crime that should be investigated and that anyone who is investigating it should be fired just seems odd to me.
Your pal, Bannon, was interviewed about firing Comey. It's hard to see any crime there, let alone obstruction of justice like I see claimed by the usual suspects.
Didn't you just a few minutes ago in the other thread claim it was my 'imagination' that Bannon even talked to Mueller? barfo
