Disagree. The far right has kept quiet and been left alone for years. Their numbers are miniscule. Now they see the left saying things they think in reverse and being told that they're monsters for saying it and that they can't say what they believe. Social media has played a bigger part in this than Trump. The right wing nuts just fall back on Trump as if yelling "scoreboard" we won. Witness people on social media starting to attack the huge numbers of left wing nuts that follow Farrakhan. It is being brought into the light of day on both sides. Back to right vs left it doesn't really matter which is worse for the country. Worse is subjective when they are both clearly bad.
That could be the case, I’ll hate it but that law will stand. Let’s fight and do our best to get both houses and the president more left-minded than now
Yes, and it was seven up to about 85 years ago, increased to 9 just to get what you desire right now. Didn't work though.
There is your closed and narrow mindedness at work. Both sides have fucked up. Its been about control and not about making our country the best it can be. Both sides need to work together. If they were doing they're jobs there would be such ammendments.
Naw! I have requested a suggested amendments be posted here on this board on several subjects over the years. Not one time has it been done. How can you be more open than that?
This is a strange statement. It is like you think Conservatives should submit the amendment you want? I can't understand how you could come up with this idea?
And then when I start talking about such ammendments you say they would be useless and uneeccssary. You cant have it both ways
I wasn’t referring to amendments. I was referring to getting judges who have interpretations closer to mine. And that happens when liberals are in charge. I’m really hoping the Dems can capture both houses and then pull the same shit the Republicans did in denying Obama his apointee. Then in 20 get a D into office with both houses and get some good appointments.
BTW. The fellow sitting next Bridges looks just like a fellow that used to work for me. Kapulka was his name. Do you happen to know who it is?
You see! That is when I call bullshit! You do not respect the Constitution at all with this tack. You want judges that can ignore it just like you. Shit! Might as well settle shit by warefar if this is the common take.
The only reason you won't go with amendments is;-------------------------! Can you complete the reason?
How many things in the constitution would you say are left to interpret? Maybe your top three? Or are you saying you want to reinterpret already settled issues?
