Politics Oregon assault weapons ban petitioners turn in signatures

I attribute a lot of that to the Rand Corp. and it's brilliant researchers such as Johnny Von Neuman and Jacob Bronowski.

 

You don't buy into the foundation unless it fits your view. You have already claimed you would break the law if assault rifles were banned in Oregon. Very unpatriotic of you.

 

It is his right to hate our founding fathers or show any amount of disrespect he feels towards them. However it is like owning a house and saying FUCK THE DEED TO THIS HOUSE.

 

Derp

 

Maybe Oregon should pass an unconstitutional limit on free speech, specifically against talking out of one's ass.

MarAzul would choose to ignore the gun law, you couldn't help but ignore the other.

 

Denver Employees Retirement Plan?

 

No, that is

W
E
E
D

 

Now you're confusing an already confusing situation even more. I think I'll just smoke this joint and forget about it.

 

That’s an obvious personal insult.

So much for your hypocritical lecture to Cippy.

I don’t hate anyone, and don’t recall ever feeling hate for anyone at any time in my life.

I hate dishonesty, hypocrisy, and cruelty, wherever they exist.

You’re a dog so bite me.

 

Wow King, you sound just like John Lennon. How’s he doing?

 

good to hear...

 

He wouldn't be breaking the law as it can never be a legitimate and valid law under the Constitution of our land.

As the Constitution makes very clear, The Right to Bear Arms is an inalienable right we are born with. It is not a privilege "granted" by the government. The Second Amendment merely re-affirms it and bans the government from ever weakening it in any way shape or form.

 

Wrong buffalo wing breath. Assault rifles have been banned in the past.

Educate yourself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban

 

And you just described Trump to a T.

 

Gun control has been passed and then overturned by the Supreme Court in the past. Just because the law passes doesn't make it constitutional.

 

I didn't say it was. I was saying that just because gun control laws have been passed doesn't make them constitutional.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/06/28/us.scotus.handgun.ban/index.html

https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91934910

 

and how would John Lennon owning a gun prevent his death? Do you go to your door with a gun in your hand every time you answer the door? Pretty ignorant statement once again.

 

Which is exactly why your post had no basis in this thread. The Supreme Court makes rulings all the time against some laws that have nothing to do with guns, but the fact remains, gun bans have been passed and put in place so yes, it can be done.