Re-signing Nurkic should be #1 on Blazers agenda

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by tykendo, Apr 22, 2018.

  1. tykendo

    tykendo Don't Tread On PDX

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    7,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He's young, developing, maturing, and has huge potential moving forward. His offensive game improved through the season, and the 4th quarter of the game 4 playoff game showed the improvement. Dame and Nurk have developed into a terrific tandem on the court. I can see the awesome possibilities moving forward.
     
  2. Scalma

    Scalma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2014
    Messages:
    23,631
    Likes Received:
    34,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This one is a no brainer. So is bringing back Ed, but Portland doesn’t completely control that situation. But from everything I’ve read Davis wants to be back so it shouldn’t be an issue. Napier and Connaughton can stay or go I don’t care. I know I wouldn’t give either one much more than the minimum though.
     
  3. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    41,775
    Likes Received:
    26,114
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
  4. Hoopguru

    Hoopguru Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2014
    Messages:
    22,194
    Likes Received:
    18,295
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I do think the big guy can help make us a contender. If he like the town and he has other reason to stay (lady, ladies) the Blazers will have a decent shot at keeping him. If The Zack Attack developed closer to the hoop, it will only make Nurkule's much more effective.
    Also, I would tie some objective measurable performance/goals for pay incentives.
     
    riverman likes this.
  5. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    124,918
    Likes Received:
    145,186
    Trophy Points:
    115
    While signing Nurk should be #1, hopefully there is a 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 on the list.
     
  6. Hoopguru

    Hoopguru Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2014
    Messages:
    22,194
    Likes Received:
    18,295
    Trophy Points:
    113
    agree. I'd probably have to flip a coin as to weather I keep Shabazz or Patty fastball.
     
  7. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Other than the WAS offer (Full MLE), the author is just tossing around random numbers, but IF Nurk gets comparable offers, I see POR matching.

    They would LOVE for him to sign a 4-year $34.4 million offer sheet with WAS and would jump all over matching that. That only comes to an average of $8.6 million/year.

    The other (strictly hypothetical) offers are higher per season, but shorter in length (all with a total dollar amount less than Meyers Leonard's contract).

    DAL: 2 years $32 million ($16 million/year)

    ATL: 3 years $39 million ($13 million/year)

    The hypothetical DAL offer is interesting. $16 million/year seems high in today's market (seems insane that two years ago Timofey Mozgov got 4 years at $16 million/year), but the 2-year contract length would give POR a LOT of flexibility in the summer of 2020. That's also the summer Turner, Leonard and Harkless all come off the books.

    If you were GM, which of those offers would/wouldn't you match?

    I'd definitely match the WAS offer. It's ridiculously below market value and would lock up Nurk at that below market rate for four seasons. I think Neil would wet himself with excitement if Nurk actually gave him the chance to match such a low ball offer.

    I'd definitely match the DAL offer, due to the 2-year contract length and the flexibility it would give us in the summer of 2020. The per year salary is a bit above what I perceive as current market value, but the 2-year contract length is what makes it appealing. It will give us two more years to gauge Nurk's improvement and a chance to resign him longer term when we have more cap flexibility.

    The ATL offer would give me the most pause, but to me it seems to be about right for current market value. So, I'd end up matching it rather than lose a valuable asset for nothing.

    BNM
     
    andalusian, BBert and dviss1 like this.
  8. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,598
    Likes Received:
    27,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'd match all 3 of those offers. Nurk at 13 per? That's a great Deal IMHO.
     
    blue9, Hoopguru, Chris Craig and 4 others like this.
  9. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,624
    Likes Received:
    20,301
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    Game. Set. Match!
     
  10. Gronk Brady

    Gronk Brady Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2016
    Messages:
    1,531
    Likes Received:
    1,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think 4/52 is probably the max I would give Nurk... anything more I’d probably let him walk... For Ed I would go 2/18or 3/24 max... Shabazz I wouldn’t resign at any price, he needs to go to open minutes for Baldwin... Pat I would give 4/20 max
     
    Hoopguru likes this.
  11. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My biggest fear is some shit team like the Lakers (the same organization that gave Timofey Mozgov 4-years/$64 million) will clear a shit ton of cap space to try to sign LeBron and PG13, get rebuffed, and then in desperation to use all that cap space will throw something ridiculous like 4-years/$80 million at Nurk.

    BNM
     
  12. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    19,977
    Likes Received:
    17,192
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
    I'm certainly preparing for the worst (this). Question: can a RFA decline an offer sheet? Or are they automatic once furnished.
     
  13. andalusian

    andalusian Season - Restarted

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    15,237
    Likes Received:
    14,648
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    San Marcos, CA
    An offer sheet means nothing until the RFA signs it. At this point, the team that holds his rights has several days (3?) to match.
     
    HailBlazers likes this.
  14. KeepOnRollin

    KeepOnRollin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    11,498
    Likes Received:
    5,679
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    North Idaho
    7 now I believe. But I think it would be tough for a young guy to turn down 20 mil even if he didn't like the new team as much as his current one.
     
  15. stampedehero

    stampedehero Make Your Day, a Doobies Day Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    12,451
    Likes Received:
    9,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Part Time Building Inspector
    Location:
    NJ
    No one in sports is worth 16 mil a year. If owners want to shell out their money, then the players are going to rake them.
     
    Hoopguru likes this.
  16. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    68,297
    Likes Received:
    67,314
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's the Wilson Pickett list!
     
    SlyPokerDog likes this.
  17. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    68,297
    Likes Received:
    67,314
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Big companies fire CEOs and give them half a billion dollars to leave …..sports money ain't squat compared to that....an ace pitcher in baseball gets way more than the highest paid NBA player and only has to throw for part of a game every 3 games or so. Some closers only pitch one inning
     
    stampedehero likes this.
  18. CupWizier

    CupWizier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,265
    Likes Received:
    7,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired
  19. hoopsjock

    hoopsjock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    16,302
    Likes Received:
    26,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Business Owner
    Location:
    North Plains
    The Lakers won't do that, they actually have a plan that would give them even more cap space in 2019 if they fail this off season. I know you meant other teams too though.

    BTW that exact scenario is why I want to get their unprotected 1st round pick in 2019 by taking Deng from them for expiring contracts this season.
     
  20. CupWizier

    CupWizier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,265
    Likes Received:
    7,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired
    lol, are we going to have a 20 player roster?
     

Share This Page