Its not merely my preference. It is what logic dictates. If a juror(s) think he is guilty on one charge than it is highly probable that they think he is guilty on others.
Can you not conceive the possibility of the converse? It just as easily could be the other, feeling that they have to convict on something, but letting him go on the overreach..
And if the jurors were inclined to ignore the evidence and find him not guilty on 17 counts, they'd have no problem finding him not guilty on the 18th. Given the type of case this is, it isn't very plausible that the evidence is only convincing to the jury on a single count. So it's probable that there are at least some guiltys. barfo
Oh, I can see it that they want to show that they do not condone the behavior, yet do not agree with the gov overreach..hey, its my fantasy, and I am enjoying it
...I'm sure that's the case. ...I never actually expected for Manafort to be found guilty on all of the counts but certainly most of them.
...anything other than your usual pig latin....see, I can be condescending too. ...I asked a simple question...if you don't want to answer it, fine
Youu keep saying that, but as far as I know, once the charges have been dealt with, he can not be charged for the same again. The only exception would be if there was a civil suite like for personal loss.
