Politics Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearing, now with New allegations!

Oh! I long for the event when one of these guys getting hassled, just drops one of these all mouths, right where they stand.

 

The same mistake was made by the Democrats with Hillary and why I think the system is broken. Currently, you can win either nomination without having a majority. You can have six qualified candidates in the primary that get 10% of the vote each and one person that most hate that wins 40%. You then have these two candidates that got the 40% battle each other and it does not result in someone winning that makes the most people happy. If Hillary had won, you would have probably just as many people unhappy.

 

I am no saint. It has it's time an place.

 

According to you, people who do not want Kavanaugh confirmed feel that way because it is "right in step with what seems to be your/their political lean."...that's a broad assumption and theory, and simply not always the case.

 

A man screaming in your face is close enough to the devil.

 

Unfathomable’: More than 2,400 law professors sign letter opposing Kavanaugh’s confirmation


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...ofessors-sign-letter-after-kavanaugh-hearing/

 

A lot of people working hard, heh!

 

Welcome to The New United States of America.

 

Yeah, but those 3 million are all on the coast.

 

Before that SCJ where not questioned so closely, most were assumed to be worthy of the trust of the people.

So I would place the blame on FDR of beginning stacking the court to not strongly support the Constitution. But FDR did not actually succeed, it took time for the worm to grow. We quit putting forth Amendments to the Constitution, too hard was I think the view.
So here we are, stack the court with the correct philosophy.[/QUOTE]

Stop it @MarAzul please. Now go look into Anthony Kennedy's appointment. You'll see he was Vigorously vetted after they found out Ginsburg smoked weed. I'll wait

Don't forget about Robert Bork and the SHITSHOW that was the Clarence Thomas confirmation either.

 

Tolerant left going high once again.

 

@dviss1

um, Perhaps you are catching on.
Prior to Bork 31 years ago, Scalia was confirmed with a vote of 98 to 0, 32 years ago.

Even with a Republican President and Democrat Senate, John Paul Stevens was confirmed with a vote of 98 to 0 43 years ago.

Bork is about when the shit show began. With phony Ted Kennedy leading the shit parade.
Although Rehnquist a year earlier was not clean either with 65 33 vote.

 

How is this relevant? Are they not humans that are registered to vote and fucking voted?

 

dviss is getting pretty tricky.