Exclusive 2019 Trade Deadline Thread

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by hoopsjock, Jan 16, 2019.

  1. blue9

    blue9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    10,729
    Likes Received:
    7,169
    Trophy Points:
    113
    1. Yes.
    2. Davis. Fall-back, SAC.
     
  2. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    36,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    if he was, why go after Okafor? He's the opposite of an inside defender.

    I think Scalma was exactly correct, the primary motivation in the Plumlee/Nurkic trade was financial.
     
  3. CupWizier

    CupWizier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,265
    Likes Received:
    7,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired
    Did we trade for Okafor? Do you believe every rumor out there? Interest means possibly just an inquiry. You are free to think what you want as nobody is disputing that there was some financial benefits, but there was also roster benefits as Olshey clearly said in your article you quoted. very obvious that some of you refuse to give Olshey credit for anything and that is why it's hard to have much respect for your opinions when they are clearly biased in nature. Might be why you quoted the part you did and ignored the part that I quoted.
     
  4. hoopsjock

    hoopsjock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    16,302
    Likes Received:
    26,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Business Owner
    Location:
    North Plains
    I'm sticking to this, even though it's not what I want.

    1. Yes

    2. Love
     
  5. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,592
    Likes Received:
    56,024
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    yuck! I agree, I don't want Love anywhere near Portland.
     
    oldmangrouch likes this.
  6. oldmangrouch

    oldmangrouch persona non grata

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    12,402
    Likes Received:
    6,323
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Since Olshey has no power to do anything and no responsibility when things go wrong - why is he making the big bucks?
     
    bodyman5000 and 1 and Scalma like this.
  7. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,592
    Likes Received:
    56,024
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    1. Yes.

    2. Moe/Leonard and pick for Prince and Lin
     
    hoopsjock likes this.
  8. oldmangrouch

    oldmangrouch persona non grata

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    12,402
    Likes Received:
    6,323
    Trophy Points:
    113
    1) NO
     
  9. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    36,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    let's review this, it won't be hard:

    the quote of Olshey I used went directly to what you and Scalma were 'disputing'. It was specific and since neither one of you mentioned any possible ancillary motivations, I didn't either. So, go pound sand with your forehead for saying I was cherry-picking what Olshey said

    besides all that, I'm pretty skeptical about those offered ancillary reasons. Why would Olshey want to get a younger C rather then just getting a better C? Plumlee is the same age as Dame. And if Denver hadn't added the 1st round pick and the Okafor trade would have went thru, I have no doubt Olshey would have tailored his ancillary reasons for Okafor..."look, we had an opportunity to get a player who was a 3rd pick in a recent draft and who shown some amazing offensive potential, and skillsets that match Terry's offense as well as Dame's"
     
  10. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    67,845
    Likes Received:
    66,602
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Casey has a tweet today on the team's homesite about Nurk being questionable for tonight against the Jazz....that should fuel the trade mill
     
    TBpup and RR7 like this.
  11. CupWizier

    CupWizier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,265
    Likes Received:
    7,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired
    Yawn! You go right ahead and review to your heaarts content.Scalma said it was only for financial reasons and the quote by Olshey showed that not be true. We will just have to agree to disagree.
     
  12. Wizard Mentor

    Wizard Mentor Wizard Mentor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    14,362
    Likes Received:
    14,438
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Master of Xen Foro
    Location:
    La Grande, OR
    OK, then NO is great because he, too, made "basketball moves" - apparently, that's all that matters....
     
  13. LayneStaley

    LayneStaley Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2018
    Messages:
    6,052
    Likes Received:
    6,499
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Badass
    Location:
    Kirkland, WA
    Anyone still believe enough in Porzingis to take on Tim Jr?

    09244E69-7556-4F35-9B68-D978E66143FD.jpeg
    Knicks 1st to Pels
     
    chzbrgr likes this.
  14. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,276
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, no, he didn't. He simply said, "it was financially motivated". You're the one who added the "just" and "only" qualifiers. This would be the very definition of a strawman argument.
     
  15. CupWizier

    CupWizier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,265
    Likes Received:
    7,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired
    And in his link it clearly said Olshey was targetting a young defensive center. Wouldn't scalma and heimer's be a strawman argument then? They both conveniently left out the quote i linked to as it didn't fit their argument. I at least in a prior post acknowledged the financial benefits as well.
     
  16. LayneStaley

    LayneStaley Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2018
    Messages:
    6,052
    Likes Received:
    6,499
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Badass
    Location:
    Kirkland, WA
    Reports say Philly is considering Fultz for Dedmon.
     
  17. Scalma

    Scalma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2014
    Messages:
    23,631
    Likes Received:
    34,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My favorite part of all this is I have whoever I’m “disputing” with on mute so I cant read any of the non sense nor do I care to at alllll lolol.
     
    bodyman5000 and 1 likes this.
  18. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    36,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    now, you're just grasping at straws, to sick with the metaphor

    I've already explained the reason for the quote I posted and it was based upon the specific discussion here, not the made-up bullshit you tried to twist out of what was actually said

    yeah, I think you're on the right track because there's just no upside in discussing anything with him
     
    bodyman5000 and 1 and Scalma like this.
  19. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,276
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you know what a strawman argument is, you would know that that is not the case. If you'd like me to define it for you, I'm willing.
     
    bodyman5000 and 1 likes this.
  20. CupWizier

    CupWizier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,265
    Likes Received:
    7,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired
    No thanks as mine was never a strawman argument anyway thus my comment as it wasn't meant to be taken seriously.
     

Share This Page