Politics Hillary Clinton says Tulsi Gabbard is a 'Russian asset' groomed to ensure Trump reelection

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...he_will_not_run_as_third-party_candidate.html

 

I suppose we could define it in a way that she's unknowing in the grooming. To me, it comes across as she's basically calling Stein and Gabbard traitors in the same vein she and others claim Trump is and there's a pretty big difference between the first two and the last one...

Edit: The reason why I say she's basically calling them traitors is when you call someone an "asset" it implies ownership, in most definitions of the word. So she's basically saying they own her.

https://www.google.com/search?q=ass.....69i57j0l5.3847j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

 

I do want a third-party candidate to vote for, but I don't want it to be Tulsi. She said she wouldn't go that route and she needs to stick with it, win, lose or draw in my opinion. I'm not sure if she runs w/o the Nomination it proves the Russia stuff to me, but I certainly wouldn't vote for her at that point no matter what explanations she tried to conjure up.

 

Or learn how to read. There’s that too. You seem to be the only one constantly struggling to decipher what I mean. Everybody else seems to get along just fine, whether they agree or not.

 

Not really. You’re trying too hard to hold your anti-Tulsi position while not disparaging Hillary and it really just comes off as disingenuous, especially from a person we all know isn’t stupid.

 

or say what you mean and mean what you say rather than post such loose ended posts that are left for interpretation. Also, if you had noticed, my replies were mostly in question form so that I could get clarification as to what you really mean, but instead I get mostly attacks.

 

100%, and thought this since day one. Way before any Hilary stuff. They both need to just go away.

 

Make it five parties so we really have a choice of corruption like it is in Italy..[/QUOTE]
She and Bill could become Queen & King of Bora Bora or somewhere.

 

Your spidey senses tingling may not be enough justification to deter those who like her policy ideas.

 

Have you tried hooked on phonics?

 

You just pulled off the rare triple "hopefully" post!

 

oh boy and now come the petty insults, lol.

 

It’s plenty. I have seen and heard enough from this woman. She’s bad news.

 

Care to elaborate? I’m genuinely curious what it is about her that drives the mainstream establishment voters bonkers. People either like her or absolutely despise her. There’s not a lot of in between. I understand her not moving the needle for some, fair enough. I just don’t get the blood-boiling hatred she draws from others. Seems unwarranted from a party that ran Hillary Clinton with a straight face.

 

- her refusal to rule out torture in Syria
- her denying that Assad used chemical weapons
- her support of Russia- bombings in Syria
- her refusal to attack Trump
- her fake “I’m not going to the debate wahhhh” then predictably going to the debate
- she’s blatantly doing this for personal gain
- Russia is a fan of hers

I could probably go find more but don’t feel like researching