Politics Hillary Clinton says Tulsi Gabbard is a 'Russian asset' groomed to ensure Trump reelection

This handy little tool does a good job of tenderizing meat. I think it would work awesome on our mods.

 

Exactly!
When some one pulls a post out of their arse, it is the post that stinks!
Not the poster.

 

Looks like a 2 week vacation is in order for my buddy marazul. Him and maris can text back and forth to each other during that time.

 

>>> Could not stomach GH Bush either. GW was no prize winner either. Could not support McCain either.

I sort of think of myself as a Constitutional Libertarian, pretty much in the minority. In agreement with the Republicans far more often than the Dems.
But still, major differences. Three huge ones are;

I hate the US engaging in Nation building or pushing democracy with occupation. A Dem/Rino failing.

I can not agree with the hard Right to Life position, even though the alternatives is disgusting. However Roe/Wade was a stupid SCOTus ruling. A Rep failing.

While not a Christian, I do recognize that this Nation was founded in general as a nation with Judaeo/Christian principles. Where the establishment clause in the 1st amendment specifically prohibits Congress from establishing any religion in the original intent, not intended at all limit a damn thing else like statues, symbols, or what ever else people use in following. A Dem/Atheist failing.

 

Yeah, well concentrate, you can do it. From where else would you expect them to pull bullshit? Perhaps arse?

 

That's correct. +1

 

I suppose that will please your minion. But not more than me.
Carry on!

 

^^^THANK YOU !

I get the same misguided rationale from some people simply because I cannot stand Trump and his maniacal BS...ergo, according to some people, by default, I must be a liberal...and I'm anything but.

 

Don't blame the post, blame the poster as the post can't put itself in the forum. Only the poster can.

 

W. C. Fields? Seems like something he'd say.

 

Not really fair to blame the poster. We really should try to blame the post and not the poster.

 

I don't see the post you are referring to.

 

It's clearly posted on the previous page.

 

Gabbard lovers will like this

 

Not sure why she should get any more access than anyone else not invited... I dont really get why so many republicans are losing it over this (or Tulsi), theres a ton that goes on DC the public doesnt know thats just reality. The inquiry process is made up of R’s and D’s its not like one party is doing it (because then I’d have an issue with it).

 

looking like shes running third party. Why? Cant win - literally impossible? But takes votes away? Who would possibly be a fan of that?

 

Right now I’m a Amy And Pete leaner.
Tulsi I applaud for standing up to Hillary as most liberal women wouldn’t.
I’m waiting for Amy to stand up also.
I’m not a Sanders or EW fan.