It may be because she wanted to vote no, knew that a no vote was futile and decided to take her chances on getting elected in a Liberal state while not really deciding any issue result. That's just a WAG. You're gonna have to ask Tulsi to get a more mystified reply. She doesn't want to give her thinking, whatever it is, away.
She's not running for re-election. Going to be a Fox News host instead, or possibly a 10-month Trump acting something-or-other. barfo
The new prosecutor in Ukraine, put in place when the new government fired the corrupt one now conspiring with Giuliani. You can look it up.
Sort of lost to Trump. Hillary did win the most votes, though which made her the more popular candidate.
As I said, the new prosecutor who replaced the old corrupt prosecutor with whom Giuliani is now considering, conducted an extensive investigation of Burisma. Deflect, deflect, deflect.
Deflect what? You have access to the files and all that? Or you just think that because MSNBC says so? Of course any time a police officer is found not guilty of something all of you will come in here and call bullshit.
How about USA Today? https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...orced-out-ukraines-top-prosecutor/3785620002/ or The New Yorker https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/12/23/the-ukrainian-prosecutor-behind-trumps-impeachment How about the LA Times? https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2019-10-05/bidens-visits-to-ukraine-under-scrutiny I'd offer the NY Times but many times it requires a subscription to read their articles.
