I'm surprised we don't have more Japanese members...

Send me to Japan, I'll deflower half of that 44.2% of women

 

I'm turning Japanese.

 

More facts.
100% of the Japanese men are truthful about their sexual experience.
39.2% of the Japanese women “fudge” about their sexual experience.

Go to Japan, (if you can afford it) you will not be able to keep your dick dry. The only complaint you will hear from Japanese women about white men is. Our dicks are too big.

 

I'm going now, I want to experience having this problem for once lol

 

Two Japanese members only count as one so you need way more to balance it out.

 

Speaking of that, I always thought they blurred Japanese porn for moral reasons. Now that I've seen more uncensored I realized they were just embarrassed.

I liked it better blurry, I could imagine it was me being blurred out.

 

Why do you think HCP likes traveling all over for work? He likes being the biggest dick in every country he goes to.

 

@jonnyboy are you surprised?

 

That HCP joke I made was so rude.

 

Asian women are terrific and I can say that they make terrific wives. Let me modify that, it all depends on the woman but they have a head start on the rest of the world.

 

Not surprised. I’m a virgin myself. It’s not surprising.

 

Kumbaya.

 

I hear they're great!

Which model did you get?

Just making a point, not criticizing Lanny's post and we all know he's sincerely offering praise, but if a Trump supporter said the same thing...?

 

The reason for the death of births in Japan is countywide impotence from 9 years of exposure to Fukushima radiation through the water, the food, the air...

Get ready for more Japanese members since Japan is the largest owner of private land in Oregon.

 

My friend is married to a Japanese girl. Fucking nightmare for him. They have a zero interest car loan. She decided on her own to put 10 grand extra towards it and 2 weeks later quit her job.

 

Your assumptions that Japanese can't cut trees and herd cattle are disgusting to me.

Commercial buildings in cities do makeup a larger block in value though.

 

Sounds like she's a Fire Horse Woman. Was she born in 1966?

Why did so many Japanese families avoid having children in 1966?
Posted on May 8, 2016 by Randy Olson Posted in data visualization
Last week, I was presenting at a conference and discussing the merits of animated visualizations vs. small multiples. On one of my slides, I presented the following chart that shows the total fertility rate (i.e., the average number of children born per woman) for the U.S.A. and Japan over a 60-year time period.



After the talk, one of the audience members came up to me and asked why there was that weird blip in Japan’s fertility rate in 1966. It turns out that there’s a fascinating explanation — an explanation that finds its roots in astrology and superstition.

Astrology and superstition
If you were born in the U.S. (or many other Western countries), you were probably assigned an astrological sign based on the day you were born: Aries if you were born between March 20 and April 19 (roughly), Taurus if you were born between April 19 and May 20, and so on. Each of these signs are associated with personality traits and various other features.

The Japanese use a similar astrological system, but one instead based on the Chinese zodiac. Along with assigning an astrological beast based on your birth year, each year also has one of the Five Elements associated with it—all that dramatically affect what your astrological sign entails.

Astrologers would like us to believe that our personality—and even our entire lives—are guided by these signs, but most people don’t take these predictions too seriously. In 1966, however, many Japanese families were still quite superstitious—and that’s why we see that blip in fertility rates in 1966.



You see, 1966 was the year of 丙午 (Hinoe-Uma), or the “Fire Horse.” As one source describes:


Girls born in [1966] became known as ‘Fire Horse Women’ and are reputed to be dangerous, headstrong and generally bad luck for any husband. In 1966, a baby’s sex couldn’t be reliably detected before birth; hence there was a large increase of induced abortions and a sharp decrease in the birth rate in 1966.

Instead of taking the risk of raising a “Fire Horse Woman,” whose headstrong nature would bring bad luck for her future husband, many Japanese families avoided having children entirely in 1966. In essence, superstition was embedded so deeply in Japanese culture that we could measure its effects on a macro-population scale.

Time will tell if superstition will strike again 10 years from now in 2026, the next year of the “Fire Horse” in its 60-year cycle. Given that Japanese is already below the replacement fertility rate (i.e., roughly an average of 2 children per woman), the result could be disastrous.

http://www.randalolson.com/2016/05/...anese-families-avoid-having-children-in-1966/