when you address your complete spin about nada proof ill then address this question. Until then im not taking you serious. Im just gonna assume its more spin.
i never made a claim, i provided an example of how it may be manipulated. I didn't even know there was an actual such incident of a positive in a car death per say. But hey??? Haahah really? Nadda? Not one? ........
sure you did... secondly what you quoted was for rr7 not you. but hey. Nadda ziltch??? Lol. That was up and up wasnt it? sigh.....
Not sure what you’re trying to ask here. At the time when Trump was referring to reports on hydroxychloroquine, I was open to the idea that there could be some cross benefit in repurposing an existing drug for use in suppressing the virus. Scientific research soon proved that wasn’t the case. When Trump suggested injecting bleach or inserting ultraviolet lights into patients, I pretty much figured out that he’s an imbecile who would say anything that supported his political views that the virus would soon just “magically disappear”.
Nobody is going to hold you down and jab a vaccine needle into your arm. You may find that certain things, like flying without need for a Covid test or being able to attend live sports events, open up to vaccinated people while those refusing vaccines don’t get the same privileges.
Here's our conversation. I think it was up and up. There was no bias against you and I'm not sure what "likes" have to do with this. You responded to posts of mine with unprovable examples and then said those examples being unprovable proves your non-verifiable claims. Your statement was this, "You are claiming nimbers you have zero proof of." You didn't say some of those numbers might not be accurate, you said zero. ZERO! If you acutely believe there is zero proof in the number of people who have died I really have nowhere else to go in this discussion with you. That isn't anything against you and yes, I think it's funny. Where do we go? If the same government agency that is reporting those numbers does that mean we also have zero proof that anyone has received a shot? Or zero proof that the shot even treats covid? I'm sorry that me laughing at your zero numbers claim upset you but IMO it was a very inaccurate statement to make.
I really feel like the like button is a big area of contention with you, and something you should probably ignore. But, to each their own. You could tell me what I'm spinning and you feel isn't a fair representation of what you wrote. You said there's zero proof the death toll is accurate. I guess I fail to see why 100% proof of those numbers needs to be there for you to believe it, but stories you otherwise find online about misrepresented counts are taken as fact. Or reasons to question the ultimate count. What we have is a fairly accurate representation of the death toll. I personally have zero proof it is 100% accurate. But what does that look like exactly? How do you get 100% proof of anything is my question? And because we have "zero proof" of the accuracy of the death count, is that reason to completely write it off? Asking sincerely. How can you every believe anything, then, that you haven't seen with your own eyes or counted yourself?
A private sporting event requiring vaccines isn't a violation of your 1st amendment right to peaceably assemble. Sorry.
Actually the courts in Oregon have ruled that children can be removed from parents who refuse to allow there kids to have medical treatment based on religious beliefs. So there is case law that about unwanted medical treatments.
you are so lost. What you arent seeing is who those posts were to. The one a out being biased was to Rr7. Not you. The one about likes was to rr7. Not you.... Im happy you can quote quotes. Can you remember who they were to?
Well, for that kind of money I might join you. You hold him, I’ll stick him. We’re going to have to use the J&J to save on time and travel costs.
